Search results

I'm not sure that's true Rob. Some of the latest stuff that has come out relates back to 2012. I would have thought Les would have told us all about this years ago if he was "in the know" as he always claimed to be. There is still the question as to why SISU have only just released this now...

I used to work there many moons ago. The staggered start and finish times helped, but it was always better to avoid broad lane as the queues used to be pretty bad, every day.

Are you sure about that? Hasn't there been many issues with the junction with the A45 causing traffic hold ups, including week ends? I think it used to work better before the "improvements".. Maybe that would be part of the infrastructure issues and costs.

Technically, they didn't. SISU put the club into administration

That was a quote from SISU's solicitors? Well, I guess it is indisputable :emoji_grin:

Don't know. I guess we'll never know the full truth of any of it.

Well, it has never been straightforward. They did go on a "rent strike", but then claimed it was in agreement with ACL...

A different one. "ACL sued in the high court and won the judgment" I think that then led to SISU putting us into administration, as ACL threatened to do so?

Blimey, there's been that many... Had to google it Guardian In our article we wrote that Sisu “simply stopped paying the rent”. It was not controversial to say so: the club’s withholding of the rent was quite a public act. A month later, after City were relegated to League One, the club’s chief...

The rent strike was agreed by both parties? Is that what you're suggesting? My recollection is that SISU broke a legally binding lease, and ended up in court because of it. And the courts found against them. Is that not right?

So, are you suggesting SISU did not go on a rent strike then? (2 can play at that game..)

I guess SISU putting CCFC into administration didnt happen then, as ACL got paid.... Bloody hell nick , you're clutching at straws

Sure it’s obvious, but on this one you’re focussed only on what they didn’t say rather than what they did. You made no comment on the 4 points they made, not even in passing. It’s an obsession with some on here, you included. I don’t think for one minute the he said they said games are over...

Do you agree with the 4 points made, or not?

Top ironic post of the year. Well done. I really don’t give a shit what they, or Sisu in their statements are missing out. I want to see a resolution to this mess, and CCFC survive. If your’e more interested in slagging off the trust, then that’s your choice. So, you go back to finding nasty...

Nobody agrees with the sentiment then? I think it's a reasonable statement, puts across what I feel at any rate. Says both sides have done questionable things, and offers 4 suggestions that I'm sure have all been raised on here, and acknowledged by most as what should happen. So, Ok for me...

Maybe not, but it sounds as if they look like you... :emoji_smile:

Which does beg the question why didn't they?

Yes, same crap as the observer headline. Could equally be "SISU refuse to answer our questions" ;)

Alderson used to lodge with my boss and his missus. I recall my boss saying that Alderson's dad had a fall out with the current manager (Milne?) as he kept instructing Brian to never cut inside, but stay wide and cross. I think he left not too long afterwards. I remember he did used to cut...