Search results

The member states' governments will be given a choice, the member states' voters will not necessarily be given one.

It depends how you define it I suppose.

So I've read. It was a comment in a Dutch newspaper article, I don't know the details. I know that after the vote to reject Ukraine associate membership of the EU the Dutch government passed a totally bogus piece of legislation which effectively nullified the result of the referendum.

The Dutch government have now solved that problem, they have banned referendums!

Surely you meant "no bale"?

The Telegraph also removed the bit about him being a Leicester City supporter, so as not to cause him any personal embarrassment.

They had good reasons at the time. It would have meant massive investment in new tooling with money they simply didn't have in the post war years. Germany on the other had massive new factories equipped with the latest machine tools and a very large pool of cheap but highly skilled labour.

Just when you thought the Telegraph couldn't sink any lower: Man had sex with horse he treated like his girlfriend, court hears

You could also blame the British Army major who restarted Volkswagen production in Germany. That worked out well didn't it?

They have jointly stated that protecting the single market is more important to them than protecting their UK profits.

I think you're missing the point that Davis told Parliament they existed when they didn't, or that they didn't when they did, whichever you choose to believe. Edit: sorry, didn't see Clint's post above this one before I posted.

The many times David Davis talked about Brexit analysis he says doesn’t exist

Or they manage to find a form of words which means all things to all sides as David Davis is desperately trying to do right now!

But hasn't it demonstrated beyond all doubt that Theresa May is totally incapable of running even a piss-up in brewery?

Yes simple, the Republic of Ireland can leave the EU superstate any time it likes.

No, it's about the government treating those who are well off more favourably than those who are less well off.

In what way are people who've paid national insurance contributions their entire working life 'a burden on the state'? I'm sorry, I don't understand that bit. How will those 'who have never worked' qualify for a larger state pension than yourself since it is only paid to those who've made the...

That's why I specifically mentioned company executives who in most cases aren't required to contribute a single penny of their own earnings even though they can well afford to.

Not entirely as it was exempted from income tax. If they choose to invest their money outside of a tax-exempt scheme then they're free to access their money at any time they wish. The point is the current rules perpetuate the class division between those who can afford to save for a private...