Search results

This transcript is incomplete - particularly the end bit which misses out bits about council officials and their behaviour

The application for a judicial review.think he was referring to the yorkshire bank ACL lease valuation. didn't specify what the transactions were just that certain people probably wanted them to remain hidden.

Several valuations done - one of which came to light in recent court case. Doesn't think the council wants them made public. I thought it had been made clear that the "public" valuation was of ACL not the RICOH. He also said that other recent financial transactions were trying to be kept hidden.

no this was what was said. It was valuations thw council were trying to keep quiet.

Surely if SISU had evidence of detrimental transactions they would have made it public by now.

Suggesting paid council officials on ACL board are misleading council. Said certain financial transactions are trying to be hidden from us. These officials are blocking the sale.

If it's designs for a new stadium then that was a quick fans consultation on what they wanted!!

I thought CCFC holdings was in the process of being wound up?

Which is really at the heart of all this. How can people take a hard line pro or anti SISU/ACL without knowing the definitive truth of who did what and when? Both sides are at fault for this.

Let's not forget the 1st judge said there was no case. The 2nd judge said there might be a case. The 2nd judge might be wrong and the 1st judge could have been right. No matter how it goes the loser will probably appeal. Any subsequent court action for damages etc. could take ages again. Don't...

I still query somebody taking a moral stance on behalf of the taxpayers when they are using money from a company based in the Cayman Islands for tax purposes.

Sorry aren't they ultimately all part of the Higgs Charity? Whilst the ACL bit and the Centre mainly have different trustees aren't both part of the Higgs Charity structure?

So they can work with you to get a mutually beneficial result i.e. the academy when they put their minds to it.

Aren't the ultimate "owners" the same? Certainly PWKH gave the Higgs response to the academy deal (not saying he's an owner)

So no hint of double standards then. If it was financial then joy must have been involved. Also didn't the higgs trust support the CVA?

Are the personnel linked with the higgs centre not the same as those linked with the higgs part of the ACL? Seeing as a deal was just sorted for youth team to stay there it would seem that the higgs people can be worked with when it's to SISU's benefit.

Clubs sell their soul for success so shouldn't be surprised if things happen they don't like. Cardiff shirts, hull's name are probably just the tip of the iceberg.

So does this mean we will never get to see a set of accounts of how assets etc. were moved between Ltd & Holdings? Or indeed from Holdings to elsewhere?

How many of the questions for ccc can be asked under the freedom of information act?

Aren't SISU claiming to be putting in 3 million a year whilst they are in Northampton? Maybe not major compared to a new stadium - built or purchased - but still money investors are having to trump up.