Search results

really. maybe most on here but i haven't seen any other evidence that the majority of people in Coventry care one way or the other.

all this talk of morality is getting ridiculous. if we're resorting to moral arguments then it must be assumed that people are struggling to find legal & financial weaknesses in the decision making process. The moral argument has its own flaws in that what are the council's responsibilities...

wasn't just the result. it was the way they completely outplayed us that night.

of course ACL would be in the audit as CCC had a shareholding in it and had made the loan whuch appeared in Ccc accounts. they were obviously satisfied by the original loan as was the jr. now they have to look at the subsequent sale and new loan.

you have to assume that Wasps have done their own due diligence and risk assessment before undertaking such a big step both financially and geographically.

we do know that the council & ACL have been preparing possible exit strategies (amongst other options) since SISU first threatened to move a couple of years ago.

exactly right. it is hard to believe that everything wasn't fully checked particularly bearing in mind they were so aware of the litigious and arguably desperate nature of SISU.

if ACL are supposedly making such big losses then they certainly can't afford Appleton at £450 an hour!!!

i thought i remembered a rep of the local Chamber of commerce/business association putting a much higher cost equivalent per game to the local economy when we were moved to Northampton.

again absolute tosh. nobody has mentioned anything illegal just for proper explanations of how and when assets were moved as those accounts were never published. I'm confused as to where you think I've said it wasn't necessary to investigate the Wasps deal. if you can be bothered to check...

absolute tosh. it is up to the administrator to investigate company activities prior to the administration. ACL had every right to ask where the money had gone since the last published set of accounts. the nonsense is that the administrator still hasn't published his findings and continue to...

If The Observer wants to make some real breaking news then tell us who really owns the club? Who are SISU Capital investors and ARVO investors. their star reporter had. the opportunity to ask those questions of JS when he was at the CET but failed to deliver. it seems like the Observer is now...

so no rent has been paid or is being paid. as far as super rent it will never get close to being relevant whilst the loan is in place.

there was no rent. that's why there is a loan which is why there is an argument and so on. if we're going to have an independent inquiry then it has to include everything. for example the behaviour / actions of all parties involved that led to certain actions/ decisions being made. also I'm...

so only webster remains from the six permanent signings made for last season. don't think any of those released have done much since. not a very good success rate.

that's by the by. the point is there is big difference in loan fees & wages for premier league youngsters and their championship equivalents.

let's also be clear that Swindon's loan signings will be on wages well out of our price range. I don't mind loans at this stage of the season. with the high turnover of poor quality permanent signings over the last few seasons i don't think we're missing out on much. have there been many...

if you don't stick your head above the parapet then people will have nothing to shoot at. !!

don't be so sensitive

okay why can they only get 2800 members?