Search results

it becomes a vicious circle in that they have to sell Maddison to make this 1m profit. So no Maddison sale and it's still a hefty loss. So hardly a resounding endorsement of Fisher's stewardship. When you don't have a Maddison to sell then you need to sell 2/3/4 players to make that money.

what is sad is that we've dropped so far down the leagues that pundits/reporters aren't aware of our situation and it takes a high-profile protest for them to discuss it. You have to wonder whether these TalkSport people even know that much about the Ricoh situation, the council, court cases...

maybe he is including the historic debt they converted into shares in this 70m+ ?

it still comes down to the owners' definition of success now is not losing money rather than any football achievement. this will generally always be opposite to what supporters want (within the bounds of sensible finances) a question for Fisher is genuinely how to you intend to reconnect with...

please can you ring up this evening and pin him down on some of these things?

Kind of curious how they can invest 70m+ in the club --- the debt on the books is nowhere that figure and they claim to never taken a penny out of the club. accounts certainly don't show 70m going in.

what is soul destroying is that Fisher admits the owners have no interest in CCFC as a football club - don't go to games, doesn't even know whether they bother to watch the game on TV or even realize he is giving the radio interview to explain the situation.

at least these presenters are trying to ask the right questions.

did he just say all clubs including ccfc are for sale?

first couple of callers didn't help by not getting their facts straight (SISU have sold the academy & training ground!!) or even being able to answer who SISU bought the club from. Presenters showing naivety as to why the FL aren't helping the fans and getting answers.

sky was surprisingly positive . it did help that there was no really bad behaviour from those on the pitch. you do have to wonder whether sky picked us for another live game because they knew there would be a good chance of further protests.

up until a couple of seasons we used to have threads about which of our players were too good for League one !!!

In a big money division did a great job with limited resources. seriously you have to wonder what some of these owners are about.

a football manager not someone who is good with the media or speaks well. sick & tired of people saying X is good with the media. Kept hearing it about Dowie, coleman et al. even Southgate seemed to get more plaudits for being good with the media & speaking well rather than his coaching ability.

good fight that one

seeing as he doesn't have my address and so can't repeat his performance I am going to be brave enough to say yes it was he. See I'm the ultimate faceless keyboard warrior!! But just in case I'll the missus to open any packages arriving through the post.

Looking at old minutes of the SCG and it moved away from its original remit of matchday experiences etc. a long while ago. It is also clear that all sides were happy to move it away from its original purpose when it suited them.

i refer you to RIck Gekoski's book :)

vipleague is advertising a stream

wasn't there a fuss recently with certain SCG members throwing a wobbly about an SBT rep on the SCG using unedited or unapproved info from a meeting?