Search results

More division. "Pro-SISU" "Sixfield die hards" etc etc. You are part of the problem. How depressing.

Look, it's another angle of attack for us fans to get behind. It really isn't about SISU this or ACL that. SISU have had pressure applied and it has resorted in them putting some answers out into the public domain. Whether you believe them is irrelevant at this stage. CCC/ACL haven't had any...

Yep, signed. And hopefully attending the demo. Long over due. Just a shame its a work day again!

The replica kit doesn't have a sponsor. The rest of your post is talk of Mad Maddy McMad from Madville, Madshire.

Bring back the days that every kit lasts for two seasons!

I voted "no" from 30 different computers, so the poll is void. Sorry.

Maybe you should start a thread Valiant. FFS. ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz

Bore off.

Seems you are right. Apologes!

As funny as it sounds, it is a form of discrimination. Whether or not the Villa would take the matter further, if the CT refused them, is another matter.

It is illegal for them to refuse advertising on grounds of football preferences. No big deal. Deal with it.

Yeah, dam them for reducing prices! Surely they should be increased. I'm fuming.

Thanks but no thanks. In my eyes, once you've picked your club you stand by it until one of you kicks the bucket. No flouncing.

No, Coleman had that and nearly relegated us.

Great input

No one of note has claimed otherwise and Haskell has even praised him.

I'm glad they also said they can see both sides to the story.

More of their fans went to Gillingham actually.

Take him to an away game then. You can't ignore kids wanting to become CCFC fans. Like hens teeth, they are.

No. "Funding" us doesn't mean keeping everything as it is. If the fans aren't coming through the doors then further spending cuts are inevitable. Playing staff being the likely priority. "Funding" us will just be the bare minimum for us to continue fulfilling fixtures.