Search results

  1. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    They came in with conditional offer 14/12/2007, purchase completed 22/02/2008
  2. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    so which two of the four claims were dropped prior to the case starting I missed that?
  3. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    Will give you credit where credit is due CC4L but going to have to disappoint on that particular one :D
  4. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    I will try to live with your doubts about my credibility Rob :facepalm:. Somehow I think I will survive. Never worked for Council or been a member of any political party. Frankly I am more interested in seeing a solution now that is good for the club than raking over coals that can not be...
  5. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    Neither ........... and to be honest RobS that's pretty pathetic isn't it CC4L will tell you I work for the council ! Just to be clear I do not work for any of the parties involved in this drama. I was appointed for 1 day only to work for the Alan Higgs Centre Trust to advise at the first...
  6. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    The appeals process according to Richard Buxton Lawyers http://www.richardbuxton.co.uk/v3.0/node/15 Appeals process We have several tiers to our legal system. Most of our cases start off in the Administrative Court, which is a branch of the High Court. The appeal route from there is to the...
  7. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    OSB: This week's verdict isn't so important for the simple fact that either side will appeal if they lose. Therefore we will have to wait until the end of the appeal hearing for the final verdict. I do love how people (inc. Michael 'I'm So Tired of Spin' Orton) are trying to spin this...
  8. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    If the importance of this case is not the verdict but getting background information out to the fans then you would seriously have to question what case there is. The implication is therefore of it being an information exercise is that SISU are relying on changing public opinion to put pressure...
  9. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review thread

    Legally neither. The action is being taken by ARVO Master Fund, SBS&L and CCFC H. That's the names on the court documents, "the Club" are not on there CCFC is actually "Otium Entertainment Group trading as CCFC" so CCFC doesn't actually have a basis in law as a separate entity to take the...
  10. oldskyblue58

    Southam United Planning permission

    Southam United have been in the process of re developing their existing site for some time it would seem The latest new ground plans have recently been submitted details are here http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/southamunitedfc/news/new-ground-plans-submitted-1232027.html What I found...
  11. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    I am not sure why it has been reclassified as a current liability (within 12 mths) Vick. There is no way that the club can repay the amount in the first place let alone 12 months. We are told that SISU are here for the long term so it seems strange their "equity" in the club is now short term...
  12. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    I just see it differently Robbo doesn't make either of us wrong or right I am going to be interested to see what bits of truth come out and fundamentally change things. By the time that this gets to the fans forum I suspect it will have been done to death. Isolated clips of He said she said...
  13. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    There are no discussions Robbo and at this point in time I do not see much likelihood of any either. Even after the JR I am not sure the prospects improve any I but try to keep some optimism there might be some give in the situation. This event is clearly focussed on pointing fingers and that...
  14. oldskyblue58

    Judicial Review - How many days will it be in court?

    There is a brief guide to the JR on the Trust Website http://www.skybluetrust.co.uk/index.php/club-information/timeline/387-the-judicial-review-a-brief-guide only the last two years skyblueweeman? :laugh:
  15. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    Tend to agree with you to an extent. I was probably being a little harsh on him but the fixed assets is usually something straight forward most directors "get"and at times ML has lectured others on finance or where finance has gone wrong in this dispute. Why go on the radio to discuss the...
  16. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    No not really, it means that at 31/05 the directors feel the prudent value to state in the accounts for current use is £360k so that assets are not overstated. What they could sell it for (eg say for housing) could be very different.
  17. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    I think the question in the interview he stumbled over was why had fixed assets value changed. I think that was when he suggested the Fans Forum The reasons why fixed asset values have changed from 1.9m to 554k are: Intangible assets (players registrations, trademarks and business goodwill)...
  18. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    I found this web site that seems to explain the JR process and appeal applications (use link top right "appeals process) quite well. http://www.richardbuxton.co.uk/v3.0/node/51 from Richard Buxton & Co, Environmental & Public Law or this...
  19. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    it will need a point of law or court procedure being got wrong I would think, doubt there is any evidence missing or new evidence after the JR
  20. oldskyblue58

    Fans Forum

    Can't see why the Directors of ACL or the trustees at the Charity would put themselves up to do it. The reality is that neither are connected to the Club any more and therefore why put themselves through it. The Council might feel they ought to because it is the Coventry team. But I am...
Top