Search results

ACL haven't paid any of the rebate back to CCC have they yet? Besides they did have the money already overpaid to them by the club, plus another 6 or 7 years of overpayments too.

Thought Larry Grayson was back for a minute..

Like people spending more time with their family or helping out in the garden?

Could this be a popular tune soon then? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NZ04BG7TfA&feature=kp

Not really had time to look through it yet, and imagine hard to sort out what's relevant amongst all the legal jargon, must try to have a proper look tomorrow. Have the CET run anything in depth apart from tweets on the day(s) about it?

Was that in the court transcripts from last week?

Sorry, thought it related to the same thing, my mistake!

I'm not saying anything, both OSB quotes. THE CT article doesn't say what they are claiming for either, just speculatting what they could claim. All irrelevant anyway if they don't win the JR.

Would have also thought that CCC would have had to shop around a few lenders for deals really, think at least three required when tendering for any work, don't know if same applies to loans, but would have thought so.

I kind of thought that was his job to be honest. Not exactly sure what else he's there for if not that? He may be called back to help Tony Blair out from his madness soon, though can see why he probably thinks that dealing with sisu and the whole clusterfuck that the club and everything around...

Yep, would ACL have let them carry on playing on there indefinitely without paying rent?

That's where the argument would lie in the JR ruling i would think, were they offered a loan at "commercial" rates? If so, was the loan from CCC to ACL at "non-commercial" rates? That would be the crux of any Stae-aid arguments I'd have thought. Did say on aother thread that I think that...

He pretty much kept us up during his three years with us, fair play to him whatever he does in the future.

If the club continued not to pay rent would ACL have let them stay?

Was all for Team Lester beforehand, really thought he'd blossomed and come out of his shell. Now just think he's a right snivelling c**t. Really thought that his missus was going to get it during the car ride whilst she was telling her "Cinderella" story, just thought a bullet would come...

Didn't ACL mind them not paying rent then at the Ricoh? Could have saved a lot of trouble and court cases if they'd just said that at the outset.

Wouldn't have thought it would have anything to do with YB really. Though the fact that the Council QC said that YB were willing to loan money to ACL at the time rather damages the CCC case that they had to loan ACL the money to "protect their asset".

He not going then?

Personally don't/didn't believe a word from any of them, but the hypocrisy is from those who who seem to think that Ranson is some sort of innocent, football and business genius sadly misled by evil Sisu.