Search results

Disagree. I'd say that Jan was pro CCFC.

Not my area of expertise, but I think that SISU could only choose to liquidate "on their terms", if they settle all third party debts - which would seem unlikely. If there are unpaid creditors then, as I recall, they get a say in the process - but I'd have to read too many dull books to be...

In my view, the most likely positive future for the club would come from administration, followed by purchase by a buyer who was in a position to do a simultaneous deal with the council/Higgs/ACL. I say administration because I think it's unlikely that anyone will be able to do a workable deal...

Sorry, this isn't the way it works. Sometimes there's a buyer in the wings, but often the key job for the administrator is to find and negotiate with potential purchasers.

So just to understand your logic, if B'ham has been for sale for a year and has not been bought, are you saying that no football club will ever be purchased again? Or is it that no football club outside the Premiership will ever be purchased again? Or perhaps no midlands club will ever be...

As I recall she wasn't on trial, so it would have been pretty tricky to find her guilty. However, I doubt that the judge's comments (as reported) would take pride of place in her cv.

Not wishing to have a go at Nathan, but Ben gradually got better and better. Nathan was looking great two years ago, but seems to have taken several steps back. It's true that most players need a run of games to show their best form, but he has played in the last 4 (?) and today was, as they...

I suppose if you keep on saying it long enough, someone will believe you........

Disturbing as it as, I broadly agree with Grendel's ratings. He did however miss out the MOTM - Tommy Hutchison walking onto the pitch at half time was by far the high point of the afternoon!

I'm guessing (hoping) that that comment isn't based on today's game. I'm not one to have a pop at our players, but Nathan had a mare today.

So why not file them?

Bit of a generalisation Lord. Way back then, I was pleased that we'd been "saved" and hoped that we'd see the benefits of proper business planning and professional management. Sadly the reality has been something very different. For me, one of the worst things has been the total...

So true - just as all our current problems are not down to the government, but to those damn Whig administrations in the nineteenth century. I can't understand why some people can't grasp this :)

Simply the best. Remember seeing his debut at home to Man City. Ran rings round Tony Book.

If it's so insignificant, why would we break the law by not filing?

Really?? They always get round to filing them eventually, it's just that they always do it late - with the ramifications that brings (not to mention breaking the law). The deadline shouldn't be any surprise to them.

You make it sound like it's a miracle that any company ever manages to do it..... It's a pretty straightforward legal requirement, that well run (moderately well run...) companies meet all the time.

Not wishing to be pedantic (!!!), but I think it was 4-1. I have a memory of the scoreboard on the Kop reading "Ferguson 4 Ipswich 1". It was all the sweeter because Ipswich had been interested in signing Fergie and before the game Bobby Robson had said he wanted to " see how Ferguson does...

Surely not a serious question! Nuddy was fabulous to watch and on his day could do some marvellous things, but Hutch was different class.

I think the FFP/other revenue issue is a bit of a smokescreen. If that really was the issue (rather than the net cost of the stadium), it'd be easy to solve. ACL give CCFC these revenues - so now the club's turnover is increased and hence their permitted wage spend under FFP is increased -...