Search results

<p> I didn't realise it was a gift of £14m for acl. Here was me with this crazy idea that acl had to make repayments with interest.

<p> Why do people think sisu have this great competence? What have they done during their ccfc tenure that suggests they are good at legal battles? C) Deffered.

<p> They owned an option to buy the land. Why they didn't just buy the land is a mystery.

<p> Poor business decisions by ccfc are business. Should the evil council have not stepped in to rescue the project? Ccfc also have a responsibility to the community, yet this is largely ignored.

<p> < 16k at HR 21k at RA Also its worth pointing out that last season, despite being in the bottom 3 all year, the average was still higher than most of the championship years at HR.

So why didnt CCFC say no? Its a very simple word.

If the Council are to blame for anything its what happened before the Ricoh project. CCFC wanted to redevelop HR, mainly by building a new 10k capacity stand on the site of the old Sky Blue Stand, as well as develop the land behind the Sky Blue Tavern into a multi purpose building (probably...

I wasn't asking why people were forced to give up shares, I was asking your opinion on it. Your whole argument is that CCFC put a lot of money into a project, then through their own mismanagement couldn't afford to finish it, so someone had to step in to ensure the club wasn't homeless. Why...

Tesco put in £60m, wheres their share of F&B? Do you think its fair that CCFC shareholders had something taken from them using emotional blackmail?

The worst thing Richardson did was sell Highfield Road before the Ricoh was built. By doing that the club was committed to moving regardless of whether it could afford the rent.

I'm not having a go at Jennings here, but with all thats going on at the moment you would have thought the Telegraph would be putting their efforts into more serious stories.

To ensure we don't start next season on -25 points. Once you take the law into your own hands (as sisu have done with this) then they deserve all they get. Also you complain about all the money CCFC put in therefore they should get something, did they not get £6m for it? CCFC shareholders...

<p> So why don't sisu challenge that through the proper channels?

<p> If the council have done wrong, why have the club not challenged it in court? Acl have used proper legal methods in this dispute, sisu have acted like a banana republic dictator.

That's business im afraid.

<p> The original sky blue kits of the late 19th century were a recognition of the citys blue dye manufacturers. JH wanted the club to have a strong identity, sky blue created the link between the City and the club. I could stomach a change to red and/or green as it still links the club to...

Agree with that. They are the ones that have zero control over what has gone on.

Our longer serving players don't seem to concerned about us each time they've let the fans down.

Of the last 130 years, just 9 of those years saw CCFC with no blue at all in their kit. Also 73 of that 130 years has saw us playing in Sky Blue. To suggest that it was an invented colour by Jimmy Hill is ridiculous.

Any indication of what time their up?