Search results

Agreed. (ten characters)

Allegedly there were certain alleged inaccuracies (allegedly) with the accounts during the reign of BFR, that is true. I know of a few concerned fans who were digging deep into those alleged inaccuracies as early as 1998, or at least trying to dig deep. There were indeed suggestions of unusual...

Yeah, but nobody's sure which half.

I think both of them see a certain version of 'truth' that is coloured by their own viewpoints, needs and biases. I don't trust either of them, though at least in PWKH's defense, he is happy to at least volunteer his version of events on a semi-regular basis. It's almost enough to make one...

“People have to understand we do not posture, we do not threaten, because that is not how you do business, you only do business in good faith. Always." By far my favourite. Especially after posturing and threatening to liquidate the club.

Maybe. Unfortunately, much like the "we woulda been relegated if SISU hadn't taken us over" argument, it's irrelevant because it didn't happen. And yes, hopefully we get that now. Though it would be nice if whoever is successful in taking us over (assuming it's not SISU) is a bit more...

To be fair to them, all they did was provide the gun. Other parties were the ones who pulled the trigger. One thing it's hard to blame SISU for is wasting money on players like Cody McDonald. That was a footballing decision made by the manager at the time, SISU (as far as I know) had nothing...

That was before everyone saw them play! :)

Easier to let everyone else do the work and poach their talent. Even better if they aren't British as you won't pay ridiculously overinflated prices. Completely agree though, academies are wonderful for clubs like ours.

Used to be Grant Thornton, don't know if that has changed recently though.

I'm not an insolvency expert, nor an accountant (anymore)...but.... I thought (as had been said on here a couple of days ago) that 75% of creditors were required to agree for a CVA? If ACL have claimed all they are owed under the lease, past and future, that may mean that 75% mark won't be...

Would it not be a way to hedge their bets in case this whole "beneficial owner" thing turns out to be a load of crap? Or they just want to stop themselves being turfed out? Maybe it's just bluster to put others off, stop themselves potentially not getting a satisfactory return for their...

Because the non-trading subsidiary had the lease that the owners were so keen to get out of?

Pretty good value, a pound for pound fee.

I might be wrong, but somebody from, or with ties to, Asia said that Huawei were apparently looking at us a few years ago. This has then been linked with the Malaysian/Chinese/Tongan/Fijian/Penguins from Christmas Island bid being fronted by this Byng fellow, who said that the companies behind...

Are you saying that I shouldn't have planned how we would spend all of our untold millions?

That horse looks a bit dopey and untrustworthy. BUFF LOCAL FAN OUT

Well there's some extra cash the club can raise right there, it can double as an F1 testing wind tunnel.

The blog (written by Skybluesquirrel) pointed that out, mentioning that if the debt to ACL is the 600k previously stated, then the three SISU companies would easily meet that 75%. As you say, if the club is found liable for the rest of the lease (which I guess is up in the air at this point...

I'd have more faith in Jenna-Louise's tactical abilities personally.