Search results

  1. MalcSB

    Do you want to discuss boring politics?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/business/pressure-mounts-on-reeves-as-starmer-refuses-to-guarantee-future-of-her-job-b2678583.html Sounds as if the rat will try to stay on the ship whilst possibly chucking those doing his bidding in to the choppy waters.
  2. MalcSB

    Do you want to discuss boring politics?

    As did a woman as PM break the brains of the left.
  3. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    Don’t make the decision contentious then. Easy.
  4. MalcSB

    FA Cup Replays / Too Many Games Argument

    The moneymen seem to be doing just fine at the moment.
  5. MalcSB

    FA Cup Replays / Too Many Games Argument

    Fans really are treated like shit these days, I wonder how clubs would feel if fans went on strike.
  6. MalcSB

    FA Cup Replays / Too Many Games Argument

    It really does stink. Yet they keep changing the format of UEFA competitions, increasing the number of game. Should ne told to fuck right off. ”Champions League”. You‘re having a laugh.
  7. MalcSB

    FA Cup 4th Round

    Hardly a prime draw, is it?
  8. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    Shouldn’t be a choice, like for managers or head coaches. Fear of the sack might concentrate the mind when making decisions.
  9. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    Mind you, VAR might have helped
  10. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    Have to make a conscious decision to try it though. Your approach seems submissive and mere acceptance of the status quo.
  11. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    Embarass them by getting them to explain themselves on camera, immediately post match, to managers who have identified issues. As Lampard had.
  12. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    How often are complaints actually investigated beyond the “ referees decision is final?” My problem is that I am a cynical, suspicious bastard who finds it very difficult to understand why identical fouls within 5 minutes of each other are given to one team but not the other. To take it away...
  13. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    But he was making decisions for nefarious reasons wasn’t he? You didn’t limit the range or definitions of nefariousnes.
  14. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    Many year ago, a colleague recounted a conversation he had had with a crap ref, along these lines. No idea if it is apochryphal or not, but it amused me at the time. Player - “ If I called you a c unit would you book me?” Ref - “Yes” Player - “If I thought you were a c unit would you book me?”...
  15. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    Including David Coote? The trouble with your assertion “almost always for non- nefarious reasons” is that, by definition, it means that sometimes they are crap for nefarious reasons.
  16. MalcSB

    Replays of incidents

    It would have been a swap, not a need for an additional match official. They really should have to say why such on field decisions were made. Some accountability would help.
  17. MalcSB

    Do you want to discuss boring politics?

    Not quite right.
  18. MalcSB

    Do you want to discuss boring politics?

    Solicited is such an interesting choice of word.
  19. MalcSB

    Do you want to discuss boring politics?

    Starmer is a millionaire isn’t he? He should be sending you loads of money on that basis.
  20. MalcSB

    Do you want to discuss boring politics?

    Hoorah
Top