Search results

Who was the second

The argument about why reform isn’t that we don’t understand their popularity it’s that it’s been said and done before and never ends well Heres a complex problem Here’s a simple answer that doesn’t require anything from me and doesn’t affect me yeah sure I’ll vote for you

You make a good point

Again understand the law and don’t break it It’s been in place 39 years

Read the transcript she wasn’t badly advised https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Lucy-Connolly-v-The-King.pdf

Doesn’t stop you and me having empathy for the kid I do agree though the advice from the new solicitor and approach is beyond arrogant and not joined up and is why the court said no way That said I didn’t watch the hearing and judges have been wrong before

Have you read the appeal Shockingly naive behaviour for an intelligent person

It looks to me like she had excellent advice but thought that being married to a conservative councillor would mean they wouldn’t throw the book at her and worse the appeal was poorly made and wasn’t rational or logical The appeal judges side completely with the defence solicitor and completely...

I think we have enough from the enquiry that cost £80mn or so to complete which Lee Anderson and priti Patel and suella Braverman did nothing about enacting the recommendations from

Fatso please read the appeal transcript I’d be really interested in your thoughts after reading it I can link it again

All caused by starmers 1986 legislation and sentencing guidelines updated in 2020 of course

The starting point for the sentence is 3 years imprisonment The starting point

It’s a fact people did go out and attack migrant hotels What’s not is that they were linked

I’m sure you have empathy for her daughter she’s done nothing wrong

Any comment on what we’re discussing

Your opinion

That’s part of the inconsistency of the defence and mitigation and the appeal She’s really suffered losing her child and understands how those affected feel so didn’t empathise but sought to inflame the situation and cause more distress and fear

Agree with all of that The transcript makes it clear why the lowest level is 3 years

Ok yep the hang em flog em brigade whataboutery. How do you manage that person. You’ve no idea have you

And …….. This was an appeal on the grounds she was mis advised by her solicitor she wasn’t It was found incredible that an intelligent lady who articulated her case well would have not understood the waiver she signed and claimed her solicitor didn’t give her the appropriate advice Looks...