Search results

Your line regarding sisu i.e. "they've not improved us but neither have they worsened us all that much" certainly made me smile.

Is it English Language exam day on here? We've had someone criticising spelling but then misplacing apostrophes and being inconsistent in the use of full stops. Now it's a muddle over rhetorical and Socratic questions. I'm tired so this post is probably error strewn itself. But to use plain...

Maybe you could launch a campaign to improve spelling and grammar on here. As well as Lord's misuse of apostrophes, as noted above, the use of full stops in his post was inconsistent. Time for people to be banned!

Lord, I think you've got a couple of misplaced apostrophes in there!!!

Someone seems to have added a bit to the Lester ad @ the Ricoh!

Totally agree Otis

Is this part of the sisu out group or something different? Are you talking to the sky blue trust?

Sadly I was doing the driving :( Left W'dale feeling v happy and then couldn't believe the Cinderford score people were texting us with. Stopped at a pub in Otley to see football scores coming in and City were winning 1-0 so all was looking good. Shame about the next 15 mins but just made me...

As no one else is replying...went to Wharfedale on Sat and the Cov lads deserve huge respect for getting a win in horrible weather/pitch conditions. To keep it ccfc linked, the atmosphere around Cov as opposed to ccfc v swindon just doesn't bear comparison. Already looking forward to Saturday...

As above, the critical point is why - if other options are rejected - is death under sisu the best option available to us?

Truisms are...truisms. If sisu offer only the death of ccfc, what precisely are you suggesting is the way forward for us and how is it achieved?

Not quite the point I was making so to be clear, and following on from threads last week, with no one saying sisu offer a positive future and the reality being lowest league home crowd in coventry since 1962, similar with FA Cup exit, no investment and a business model that has no interest in...

In the spirit of debate, it could also be asked where the 'rich people ownership' model has brought footballing success apart from Chelsea and Man City? Blackpool, Blackburn, Birmingham and of course us are hardly a great advert!

Hi NW - just realised I think it was maybe you not Chief I had a previous discussion with about this. Sorry if I'm labouring the point but if no one is saying sisu offer a positive future and instead sisu = slow death, that is a significant change which suggests thinking about things...

With absolutely no one saying 'yes, we have a positive future under sisu' and lots of posts saying people won't renew STs, record low crowd on Monday etc, the slow death scenario seems highly plausible. That scenario then changes the onus from 'justify a change and show it's going to work' to...

Agree, which is one of the practical as well as principled reasons for opposing the wasps deal. But position from this thread is no one is saying things will get better under sisu. The facts of the matter point to on-going decline under the business model they've now got. If all that sisu's...

The question 'Can anyone offer even the tiniest sign that things will improve under sisu?' has had 75 replies covering 8 pages with 4.7k views - but not a single post with anything that provides a positive answer. I guess that could be read as an answer in itself. With respect to those calling...

With no one else providing an answer, you really were my last hope for providing even the smallest sign that things will improve under sisu!

Like you, I'm just a member of the Trust so you have as much idea what they're thinking as I have. I regularly questioned ACL's profitability and still can't get over what the Council did with the Wasps deal. My line has always been team and fans before politics and profits and latest...