Search results

This case isn't about CCFC as such though is it. They are not even named as claimant on JR1. Even Fisher etc in the past have said it isn't anything to do with CCFC, and wont affect CCFC

I think the judges are being quite focussed on what they are looking at. Namely did the act of providing the loan contravene state aid rules. Much of what was said was just background and a good chunk not really relevant to the CCC decision, it just explains why they got to a point where they...

so both sides colluded to prejudice the rights of a creditor :thinking about: if to be believed it seems they had a plan mapped out to do it. Fail to see how either side can claim the high ground regarding business ethics or double dealings in that case

No real detail in the accounts so can only guess........ That year will have seen the legals, professional and PR costs of the dispute kicking in Some of the overheads like power will have increased due to the greater usage There was a certain amount of restructuring going on The Olympics...

SISU QC making a few points about the ACL financials . I assume he is referring to the business plans at the time of the loan January 2013. Saying turnover was suffering and savings could not be made. So no commentary but what was in the ACL accounts that resulted from what was going on. CCFC...

Early days in this round of court hearings. I wouldnt read anything in to Judges questions or that one side or other is winning. Best chances anyone gets in court is 50:50. So far we are only hearing one side of the argument I would think in this particular JR then compensation if awarded at...

that's when the accounts that cover the present period get published sbwm

It has got to be hard to argue the squad isn't stronger defensively now than it was a month ago. The midfield seems to have a lot of numbers to it. We haven't lost Maddison this season but are we stronger in attack than we were a month ago? Overall in theory we surely are no worse off than last...

Just a summary of the various reasons with perhaps a few new ideas thrown in. Not all should be taken seriously. Take your pick of all none or some....... add any others - the lad wanted to go (apparently he never asked to) - manager wanted rid of him (clear he didnt want that) - he was the...

I hope it isn't in my firm :D

Seems to me that Mr Andersons modus operandi is to say a lot, carefully explaining the obvious but never actually saying anything meaningful. he has been here long enough now to be put under better scrutiny just my opinion

Think it is all football income including player sales. This is the reply I got from FL some time ago "Income generated by a club that forms part of its football activities such as, commercial revenues, gate revenues, solidarity payments, Football League payments, donations, net transfer...

my understanding is that it is the funds actually received not receivable. So if they got £1m of the £2m now then the budget would be done on the £1m. The remainder would kick in when they receive it say next season That of course is probably open to the FL discretion rule :thinking about:

Hard to reconcile selling the supposed brightest prospect in the squad that we own with the need to build a team on the back of other teams loan players isn't it the foundations look a bit rocky to me even given that in L1 teams squads are quite short term

Doesn't seem that someone worked this out very well does it. So we have 6 loans, 5 we can use in any one matchday squad, which means extra cost doesnt it for sitting around and an extra headache for TM to keep all six happy

good point stupot

Think this is all about the short term financing of the club. Maybe a sum now plus the loan then more in the summer when CCFC have no cash flow then probably more end of next season The add on's might never come but in any case will take time if dependent say on appearances etc. If he goes...

Personally think that tells us very little I think we all understood that these deals are done in stages, the first stage being the loan back. Did we get a lump sum now or will it be in the summer when it will be the only cash flow for the club? Its fair to say that the majority of this...

I assume the source for this must be close to the club? :thinking about: or perhaps Norwich If it is CCFC why put out a figure like £9.5m. Yes it might say look what a good deal we have done, but what will be read by many fans is that over the near future we have £9.5m to spend. That just may...

Think for now we should concentrate on the actual fee now that we know we will get rather than clauses that may never kick in. He may never play enough games, he might get injured, he might get homesick, he may never be sold on by Norwich, he may never play in the Premiership or for England who...