Search results

Stopped for now - so come to an end? But could be pick up and continue in the future - so, they're actually on hold. I don't agree they should have put the negoations on hold for this reason, but equally I don't agree with SISU's decision to proceed with a further appeal process. Both...

Stopped for now - so come to an end? But could be pick up and continue in the future - so, they're actually on hold. I don't agree they should have put the negoations on hold for this reason, but equally I don't agree with SISU's decision to proceed with a further appeal process. Both...

So you know categorically that the negoations won't continue at any point in the future?

I'm not so sure you understand what the term negotiations actually means. They've not stopped, they've not come to an end. They've been put on hold. You said he's lied. That in fact is a lie.

No, he's not lied. The negotiations haven't been scrapped or abandoned, they've been put on hold. A point was reached where they were put on hold, which he openly acknowledged.

Both of them are saying the same thing. The point that appears to be being missed is the specific question they were both asked - Anderson was asked a direct question - "Were you able to reach any provisional agreements / common ground on the 17 or so areas where you were looking for a...

It's just been awarded the CAMRA Coventry and District pub of the year award ;) http://www.coventry.camra.org.uk

I just think we need to be grounded about the proposal at this stage. We've had to may false dawns and my concern is this >>potentially<< could be another. Not a malicious one, but that it could be unworkable or the situation may not pan out as hoped. Yes, we all accept we're in a shit...

Challenging the proposed move? It's been indicated that parking/access won't be an issues. Due to the location I'm not able to see how this can be said with such certainty. Are you 100% sure that such issues won't arise. It's one thing have blind faith in your club, but a totally...

So even before seeing the plans you're able to debunk points around potential access or parking issues? Would be intetested to hear how.

Do I honestly think people will forget all the stuff that's gone on before, pull together and fill the Ricoh? No I don't.

Honestly, are you seven?

Simon has said, over an hour and a half ago, the best route would be to directly contact CT Editor Keith Perry via [email protected] with idea but that's not been added here for some reason.

From the minutes - "The football club needs somewhere to play – we have at least 2 more years at the Ricoh and could extend if needed."

The pathetic fall out and subsequent acting like petulant children (on all sides) about four years ago. It became a finger pointing "He said", "She said" situation and that's lead to the situation we find ourselves in today. Professional people shouldn't act in that way - personalities and...

You'd not worked out I am Simon?

I'm sad - but not lonely.

I've never said, suggested, indicated, inferred or implied there's a problem with the thread. The issue arose because of you chucking your teddies out of the pram about me including details of SISU's broken promises - hammering all sides is the way forward I thought? You then said I should...

Right - can you decide if it the timing of the posts, the lack of clarity in the posts or it being obvious what I mean, despite the text not actually saying that. I get the feeling you're getting your conspiracy theories muddled up.

Take your tinfoil hat off for two minutes. The thread was about broken promises, so was relevant. However you'd decided to focus purely on those of Wasps - why? I thought all sides needed hammering? Why didn't you start a thread pointing out the broken promises of SISU or have the thread...