Search results

'The Sky Blue Trust has launched the campaign, and it has the backing of the Telegraph' http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/campaign-launched-save-coventry-citys-11440001

I think we'll stay in and it'll be more down to the British psyche than all the facts and figures that are being thrown around - we don't like change. I'm not saying this is a good barometer when presented with such an important decision, but has similarities of why people stay in jobs they...

You're voting Remain right...........

Prove it!? ;)

http://coventryobserver.co.uk/news/opinion-coventry-must-cherish-sporting-pillars-sky-blues-cov-rugby-club-not-just-favour-wasps/

And this has what to do with the fact it isn't blackmail?

So, as I've said it's not blackmail. They're being twats. But, definitely not blackmail.

Because you're assertion that it's blackmail is incorrect I'm a Wasps fan. The SBT equivalent of Godwin's Law strikes again!

One was said? Where and when? It's a direct quote? Are you suggesting that there circumstances where the legal actions would continue for ever, they'd never stop? What demand has been made? Why aren't SISU/CCFC pursuing legal act regarding this apparent blackmail? For clarification, this...

No it's not.

That's not a demand. A demand is telling someone they must do something - "You must drop the legal action". Allowing a course of action already underway to conclude prior to negoations isn't telling anyone to do anything, therefore not a demand. It's not blackmail.

Where's the demand? What demand have they made? You can't just pick and choose the parts that you think fit.

What are the 'unwarranted demand with menaces' ? "The negotiations are on hold until the legal matters are resolved" isn't, so maybe you can enlighten me?

It's not blackmail at all - "Blackmail. (1)A person is guilty of blackmail if, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, he makes any unwarranted demand with menaces; and for this purpose a demand with menaces is unwarranted unless the person making it...

Obsessing? You'd decided to wade in and you were wrong - me highlighting that doesn't equal that I'm obsessing. You had the option to drop the matter (correct context as it was ongoing) but didn't take it.

SISU want to proceed with legal action, whilst I don't believe it's the correct course of action, if they believe it is then they should be able to proceed as they deem appropriate. Wasps want to put negotiations on hold, whilst I don't believe it's the correct course of action, if they...

Can you make you're mind up about this? "SISU choosing not to proceed is them dropping it isn't it?" - the answer to this is, as I've said several times, no. You then say turn it 'pretty much' - no it's not. Now you've switched to it being the same result! Not going ahead with JR2 is not...

What are you on about fault? If a situation was reached whereby it was necessary for an alternative venue to be found, who would make those arrangements?

'Pretty much' - Honestly!? If legal proceedings haven't started you can't drop them. The answer to your question remains no.

That would be, if required, for SISU to make the necessary arrangements - Walsall was mooted previously. Yes they have as a back up plan to moving to The Butts.