Search results

They may not have known that Otium is also (alledged) non compliant with Secions 441 and 451 though !

This was several months ago, yet still not complied !

The Football League has already been made aware of this article, as has Paul Appleton. Now the national press are picking up on this both the Football League and Mr Appleton may be asked to "why" the preferred bidder is "fit and proper" as, in accordance with F L rules, it does not comply.

Typo, sections 441 and 451 (not 551).

If the allegations turn out to be fact ie, that Otium, CCFC Ltd, CCFC H Ltd and SBS & L Ltd are in breach of the Companies Act Sections 441 and 451 (I understand a criminal offence) and a breach of Football League rules, did the Administrator mention this in his findings to the appropriate...

I am hoping all these adverse comments will reach the Football League, grab nation wide media attention and then maybe SISU might realize that selling is the best option. Hope so, but doubt it !

Have ACL's Lawyers been made aware of this article I wonder ?

Spot on ! Agreed !

Without Prejudice. It would appear that the preferred bidder the Administrator selected, Otium, is alledgedly in breach of the Companies Act Section 441 and its Directors under Section 451 and also it's associated companies. Is a breach of the Companies Act Sections 441 and 451 a criminal act ?

I have emailed the Football League, the Caters News Agency and also asked Paul Appleton if he is aware that Otium, CCFC Ltd and CCFC H Ltd are allegedly in breach of the Sections 441 and 451 of the Companies Act.

Just sent the link to the News Agency as I feel the Football League cannot ignore it's own rules and this should be investigated. Is it possible the Football League were not made aware of this nor Mr Appleton ?

I think as many Nationals, TV, Radio, Journos, should be made aware of this headed. " Has the Football League ignored it's own Rules ?". Any one know how to contact the News Agency ?

Has anyone sent this link to the National Press and the Coventry Telegraph/Observer ? I sent it to the Football League.

emailed to Football League !!!!

Being as we are still in Administration and ACL say the club can play at the Ricoh for free whilst in Administration, surely it's up to the Administrator where we play, not Fisher's lot ? If ACL challenge this we could be in Admin for sometime.

I can't believe for one moment that ACL is doing nothing -- something must be going on behind the scenes. Problem is, we can can guess ! One thing is certain, they are not just going to sit there and do nowt. A statement said the Board of ACL was meeting to discuss the situation. Just...

It's a long time ago now for most of you to remember, but in the 1960's and 70's gates of 36,000 were not not unusual and certainly no less than 28,000. Several times we had gates over 40,000.. even for a league match against Wolves we had 54,000 ! The population is there to support a big team !

Hope this never happens but if this drags out would you accept a further 10 point (or more) deduction and possible relegation to Div 2 if it finally meant getting rid of SISU ?

Either way I hope the FL delay ratification pending further investigations, particularly in view of PH4 news !

I have just emailed the Football League, marked URGENT not to ratify Appleton's choice until further investigations are carried out. Also advised them of this latest development.