Rules tweaks that might be made (1 Viewer)

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Being trialled in World Cup.


Maybe


Trial in Minor league
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
When Coventry City aren’t playing all the other teams should be asking “Where’s Coventry City?”
 

AJB1983

Well-Known Member
Should be the body mass/torso. Don’t see why that’s so difficult. If any part of the bodies are overlapping then it’s onside. If there’s a gap then offside. Easier to measure with this semi-automated as well.
 

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Trying to reduce time wasting by new laws like the subs only having a set time but introducing more VAR for corners

Great one FIFA!

Sent from my Pixel 10 using Tapatalk
 

AJB1983

Well-Known Member
Surely it’s all the same problem of drawing a line and determining if a player is past it?
That’s true but then I think there’d be less arguments about it being as picky as someone’s foot being bigger (wright/wan-bissaka). The perceived advantage to the attacker if his body is clearly ahead of the defender would be easier to swallow.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I don't think Wengers alteration was supposed to be less contentious or easier for the officials? Wasn't it about promoting attacking play and making the games more exciting/more goals
I think some of the argument is that this will actually hinder that, as teams will just sit tighter defensively. So instead you'll just get a load of Pep-style passing from side to side trying to break through a low block, or get the ball being hoofed from one end of the pitch to the other and midfield becomes pretty much irrelevant.
 

Lamps

Well-Known Member
The offside one should be easy. If it looks straight away that it's offside then it is. If there's no clear infringement and you have to look in more detail then it isn't. All decisions made within 5 seconds so then VAR wouldn't be noticed in the stands like it is now.
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
The offside one should be easy. If it looks straight away that it's offside then it is. If there's no clear infringement and you have to look in more detail then it isn't. All decisions made within 5 seconds so then VAR wouldn't be noticed in the stands like it is now.
Yes, why not set a time limit on VAR of (say) 10 seconds. If they can't call a player offside in that time it's clearly not obvious, so advantage to the attacking team.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Yes, why not set a time limit on VAR of (say) 10 seconds. If they can't call a player offside in that time it's clearly not obvious, so advantage to the attacking team.

And ban the line tool. In fact ban VAR and just give the ref 10 seconds to review at the sidelines on a replay
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
Why don't they address the elephant in the room, all these rugby tackles in the 6-yard box, penalty area for corners and free kicks and then the referees holding up play just to have a little word in their ear for it to continue anyway.

The referees can give penalties and it would stop it, why don't they. 🤔
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top