Stadium update (5 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Longer term, we may want to consider the Wasps/Birmingham training ground.

Blues were planning to move back to their old Wast Hills training ground next year but it looks like they will be remaining in Henley in Arden until their 'Sports Quarter' is built.
Can't use that mate. Wasps hitman said Brum was only temporary because the new Wasps would be using it
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Can't use that mate. Wasps hitman said Brum was only temporary because the new Wasps would be using it

Is that before or after they build a 20,000 seater in Kent?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Who knew there was so much money in rapeseed oil
haha, my thoughts exactly. I got a shrug when I asked how King could afford all this. Although by the time the news had reached our block who knows how many revisions it had gone through. Probably started as something completely different.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Longer term, we may want to consider the Wasps/Birmingham training ground.

Blues were planning to move back to their old Wast Hills training ground next year but it looks like they will be remaining in Henley in Arden until their 'Sports Quarter' is built.

What’s wrong with staying at Ryton and just upgrading it.
Is the site too small?
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Why, what's wrong with having it separate. More focus for each set up. Doesn't want the interpretation of too many bodies on site. It seems to work well as it is

The academy players would have access to the better facilities.

I've read what Doug has said a few months ago and find it interesting that he's claiming the Higgs is better for the academy because it's in the community and is 'gritty'. If we're trying to compete with better academies like Birmingham and Villa close by, it probably doesn't help showing kids and families around a community sports centre compared to a fancy training ground.

I'm pretty sure the majority of clubs have the academies based on the club's training ground. Leicester built theirs to incorporate the academy. The likes of St George's Park was built to allow the younger sides and women's teams to be on the same site.
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
The academy players would have access to the better facilities.

I've read what Doug has said a few months ago and find it interesting that he's claiming the Higgs is better for the academy because it's in the community and is 'gritty'. If we're trying to compete with better academies like Birmingham and Villa close by, it probably doesn't help showing kids and families around a community sports centre compared to a fancy training ground.

I'm pretty sure the majority of clubs have the academies based on the club's training ground. Leicester built theirs to incorporate the academy. The likes of St George's Park was built to allow the younger sides and women's teams to be on the same site.
Blues have recently been upgraded to Category 1 status academy wise. We are Cat 2.
A part of that is related to facilities - when they got Cat 1, the media stuff was showing facilities at the "Wasps" EPC that homes Blues now.

As it stands, Villa/Leicester/Blues all Cat 1, we are Cat 2.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Blues have recently been upgraded to Category 1 status academy wise. We are Cat 2.
A part of that is related to facilities - when they got Cat 1, the media stuff was showing facilities at the "Wasps" EPC that homes Blues now.

As it stands, Villa/Leicester/Blues all Cat 1, we are Cat 2.

We are far behind those clubs. Near impossible to attract new talent.

Good example is that kid from Cov playing for Leicester currently.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Top