Stadium update (26 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Longer term, we may want to consider the Wasps/Birmingham training ground.

Blues were planning to move back to their old Wast Hills training ground next year but it looks like they will be remaining in Henley in Arden until their 'Sports Quarter' is built.
Can't use that mate. Wasps hitman said Brum was only temporary because the new Wasps would be using it
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Can't use that mate. Wasps hitman said Brum was only temporary because the new Wasps would be using it

Is that before or after they build a 20,000 seater in Kent?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Longer term, we may want to consider the Wasps/Birmingham training ground.

Blues were planning to move back to their old Wast Hills training ground next year but it looks like they will be remaining in Henley in Arden until their 'Sports Quarter' is built.

What’s wrong with staying at Ryton and just upgrading it.
Is the site too small?
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Anyone else notice the new floodlights in place yesterday?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
What’s wrong with staying at Ryton and just upgrading it.
Is the site too small?
You’d need to buy the Connexion to expand and that needs a willing seller. But I would guess that is on his list as well.

But King has said before that he likes having Higgs for the academy and Ryton for first team so buying Higgs and upgrading it wouldn’t affect Ryton.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Why, what's wrong with having it separate. More focus for each set up. Doesn't want the interpretation of too many bodies on site. It seems to work well as it is

The academy players would have access to the better facilities.

I've read what Doug has said a few months ago and find it interesting that he's claiming the Higgs is better for the academy because it's in the community and is 'gritty'. If we're trying to compete with better academies like Birmingham and Villa close by, it probably doesn't help showing kids and families around a community sports centre compared to a fancy training ground.

I'm pretty sure the majority of clubs have the academies based on the club's training ground. Leicester built theirs to incorporate the academy. The likes of St George's Park was built to allow the younger sides and women's teams to be on the same site.
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
The academy players would have access to the better facilities.

I've read what Doug has said a few months ago and find it interesting that he's claiming the Higgs is better for the academy because it's in the community and is 'gritty'. If we're trying to compete with better academies like Birmingham and Villa close by, it probably doesn't help showing kids and families around a community sports centre compared to a fancy training ground.

I'm pretty sure the majority of clubs have the academies based on the club's training ground. Leicester built theirs to incorporate the academy. The likes of St George's Park was built to allow the younger sides and women's teams to be on the same site.
Blues have recently been upgraded to Category 1 status academy wise. We are Cat 2.
A part of that is related to facilities - when they got Cat 1, the media stuff was showing facilities at the "Wasps" EPC that homes Blues now.

As it stands, Villa/Leicester/Blues all Cat 1, we are Cat 2.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top