Hi Andreas- I will try to enter into reasonable debate with you once more and seek your polite concurrence to same..last time you used unwelcome expletives against me I think(?), but this is a forum, where debate at a level above abuse is appreciated.
I am one of "The Hill" protestors, my son and I are, we are less frequent than some, given marital estranged position its less easy for us than some perhaps, but do attend when we can and will continue to do so. We refuse to enter Sixfields, however we choose this position not in support of 'attrition wars' i.e seeking SISU exit by such means i.e NOPM because in my view that is a futile position, we do not enter Sixfields because our respective consciences do not think its the right thing to do, based on a moral based position we took, using our own installed values, it so happens that we feel vindicated (but not pleased by) by the legal system.
Now does this mean that those that enter Sixfield have no conscience or morals as seemed to be the root cause of your anger towards me(*?) last time,
no of course not. Morals and ethics are learned behaviours and positions adopted through life, influenced by many factors... I asked you last time, and politely again do the same... Do the legal judgments not cast at SISU with damning derision by consecutive judges require you to review your position and not attend Sixfields- not through any deviant NOPM campaign, but because of values?
If this brings you upset then I apologise in advance.
*reference
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...turn-to-Ricoh-this-season?p=745030#post745030