Immigration and Asylum (15 Viewers)

wingy

Well-Known Member
Wasn't there a bloke arrested for walking home from work about a year ago suspected of having a knife or something, just a tradesman using public transport or whatever, probably a Catholic or something or agnostic?
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I reckon the Mrs must have been visiting mosques having seen the state of her axe wound.

.... I'll get my coat
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator
haven't Ng a thread to collect crimes of immigrants is a bit of a racist thread really

Is it racist to point out crimes committed by immigrants (regardless of colour or nationality) in a thread about immigration and asylum?

Guess it's a way to try and shut down things being mentioned.

(You forgot the typos again)
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The Telegraph has a story today complaining that now "Labour is finally getting migration under control" there are knock on effects.

"It’s a nightmare for Reeves. Much lower numbers of migrants would cost the Treasury billions"

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Not sure I see much of a link between the two stories. The first seems the type of thing that has been going on as long as anyone can remember, and there are probably many more undetected people working in positions of power passing information to other countries, and we are undoubtedly doing the same in other countries.

The second is plain old fashioned greed. The only thing you could really question is the vetting process. Especially as it reads as if he's newly recruited. As we're needing to recruit and train huge numbers very quickly is the process thorough enough. But with these things if there's no record of previous crimes not sure how you successfully identify the risk.

The good news in that case is that it appears to have been very quickly detected and he hasn't got off with dismissal and a slap on the wrist.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Not sure I see much of a link between the two stories. The first seems the type of thing that has been going on as long as anyone can remember, and there are probably many more undetected people working in positions of power passing information to other countries, and we are undoubtedly doing the same in other countries.

The second is plain old fashioned greed. The only thing you could really question is the vetting process. Especially as it reads as if he's newly recruited. As we're needing to recruit and train huge numbers very quickly is the process thorough enough. But with these things if there's no record of previous crimes not sure how you successfully identify the risk.

The good news in that case is that it appears to have been very quickly detected and he hasn't got off with dismissal and a slap on the wrist.

The link is easy.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Those of us old enough will remember when people crossed the channel hidden in lorries arriving via ferry. Once that was clamped down on they moved to small boats.

In the most predictable news ever now that one in, one out has been implemented for people arriving by small boats the number of people arriving hidden in lorries is surging. This includes people who have previously tried to cross in small boats and been removed under one in, one out.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Those of us old enough will remember when people crossed the channel hidden in lorries arriving via ferry. Once that was clamped down on they moved to small boats.

In the most predictable news ever now that one in, one out has been implemented for people arriving by small boats the number of people arriving hidden in lorries is surging. This includes people who have previously tried to cross in small boats and been removed under one in, one out.
Only works with comprehensive agreements with other nations
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Surely it was the removal of open borders that stopped the lorry crossings?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The Afghan Rapist from Nuneaton has been given 15 Years and then deportation upon completion of his sentence.

So he costs the taxpayer over half a million pounds to keep him here - money really well spent
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
So he costs the taxpayer over half a million pounds to keep him here - money really well spent
Annoying but what's the alternative? I mean I'm pro death penalty for scum like this, but as that's not realistic if we deport now he'll not serve time and probably come over again as a free man to do it all over again.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Annoying but what's the alternative? I mean I'm pro death penalty for scum like this, but as that's not realistic if we deport now he'll not serve time and probably come over again as a free man to do it all over again.

I think if you dumped him in Kabul tomorrow he’d be dead in a week
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
If you counter protest something that is against a child being raped then it's not hard to work out.

Draft him in to their spare room.
If you counter protest something that is against asylum seekers in general it’s different story.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Shame they turned up to people angry about a child rape then.

Let any unions who funded the counter protests pay this cunts legal costs and translators too.
It is possible to both support the rights of asylum seekers and oppose their smearing while also wanting criminal asylum seekers dealt with.

It’s not mutually exclusive.
 

Nick

Administrator
It is possible to both support the rights of asylum seekers and oppose their smearing while also wanting criminal asylum seekers dealt with.

It’s not mutually exclusive.

They shouldn't turn up to counter a protest about child rape then.

All shipped in and won't have to be walking through the parks in Nuneaton or live by the hmos.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top