Six Team Play-Offs are coming (12 Viewers)

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I can't see the appetite for it really. Does mean less dead-rubbers when 12th v 13th still matters a few weeks out, but we already have a huge gap between Champ and Prem and I can't see how this helps and can only assume there's a financial benefit.
 

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member
I can't see the appetite for it really. Does mean less dead-rubbers when 12th v 13th still matters a few weeks out, but we already have a huge gap between Champ and Prem and I can't see how this helps and can only assume there's a financial benefit.
Absolutely zero co-incidence whatsoever in my eyes that this argument has come about now you have got American's funnelling money into two of the divisions clubs I might add
 

skybluepm2

Well-Known Member
Why must these cretins always try and tinker with a product that already works so well?!

Saying that, it could go in our favour next season and beyond if we continue to make a complete pigs ear of things! 🙈
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
They've said it needs a majority of 13 clubs to be approved.

Without getting all 'Brexity', majority needs to be more than just over half. I don't care what the technical term is but it should be a higher % of clubs voting for it. If just 13 clubs vote for it, then 'nearly a majority' rejected it.

Needs to be a clear win on something like this, not something divisive.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
It's the Americanisation of sport - Dead rubbers are fine, if you want your matches to matter then fucking win more in the majority of the season.

Sent from my SM-S911B using Tapatalk
I've attempted to write two posts but this is the takeaway put simply.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
It's the Americanisation of sport - Dead rubbers are fine, if you want your matches to matter then fucking win more in the majority of the season.

Sent from my SM-S911B using Tapatalk
tbh I'd quite happily go back to 3 up, 3 down but there's zero chance of that happening.

In reality how many dead games are there with the present system? Can't be that many games where neither team has anything left to play for.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
tbh I'd quite happily go back to 3 up, 3 down but there's zero chance of that happening.

In reality how many dead games are there with the present system? Can't be that many games where neither team has anything left to play for.
I'm just plucking out of the air but the feels say around 3possibly here.
 

JSL

Well-Known Member
I personally think that the bottom two and top two of exch division should be auto promoted and relegated and then places 3 and 4 from the top and bottom of adjoining leagues should play each other to see who goes up and who gets relegated
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
I personally think that the bottom two and top two of exch division should be auto promoted and relegated and then places 3 and 4 from the top and bottom of adjoining leagues should play each other to see who goes up and who gets relegated
Would that reduce the parachute payments to say half distribution?
 

CCFC96

Well-Known Member
All for anything that keeps more of the sides in the division playing for something longer in the season. Think a team in 5th/6th haven't gone up via the play-offs in a long time so don't think it really gives any sort of safety blanket.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Self serving owners. No one is asking for this and it’s not fair for a team which finished 3rd to lose out on promotion to a team in 8th.

Nonsense

Though people used a similar argument about losing to 6th place when they were first introduced, (for the record, I'm not in favour).

I also wouldn't be surprised if this is some bone they're throwing the Chsmpiondhip teams ahead of a restructuring (reduction) of parachute payments.
 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
I personally think that the bottom two and top two of exch division should be auto promoted and relegated and then places 3 and 4 from the top and bottom of adjoining leagues should play each other to see who goes up and who gets relegated
Didn’t they do something similar at one time?

In the first two seasons, the team one place above the relegation zone in the First Division, along with the three clubs below the automatic promotion positions in the Second Division, took part in the play-offs.[10] In the inaugural play-off final, First Division Charlton Athletic faced Second Division Leeds United but they could not be separated over the two home-and-away legs, so the tie was settled in a replay. Played at a neutral ground, St Andrew's in Birmingham, Charlton won the game 2–1 after extra time to retain their First Division status, while Leeds remained in the Second Division.[10][11] The following season, Middlesbrough beat Chelsea 2–1 on aggregate, and replaced them in the First Division.[12] The primary objective of the play-offs was achieved within the first two seasons, namely the reorganisation of the four leagues with 20 clubs in the first tier and 24 in the second to fourth tiers.[13] However, the popularity of the play-offs was such that the post-season games were retained and the 1989 play-offs were first to feature four teams from the Second Division:[13] Crystal Palace beat Blackburn Rovers 4–3 over two legs after extra time in the final.[14]
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Self serving owners. No one is asking for this and it’s not fair for a team which finished 3rd to lose out on promotion to a team in 8th.

Nonsense
But it's also not fair a team finishing 3rd loses out on promotion to a team in 6th. Why is 6th acceptable but 8th is nonsense? We've had instances where teams with over 80 points have lost out to teams with 60-odd. 20 point difference over a season and the team with the lower total gets promotion. It's nothing to do with fairness, everything to do with adding more games and revenue.

Personally I'd love it if there was far more movement between the divisions, reducing the possibility of these closed shops and also making it more interesting for fans each season as you play even more different teams and get to go to a greater number of different stadiums. I'd be quite happy if even the top 25% went up, the bottom 25% went down and the middle 50% stayed where they are.

And while I'm at it, I'd probably also reduce the number of teams in each division to reduce the number of games that seem to pile up towards the end of the season due to cup competitions etc, often resulting in player injuries from fatigue. One game per team per week, give the cups designated game weeks and maybe even allow for a mid-season break in Jan.
 

Ricketts

Well-Known Member
No point in having the season. Just play the play offs. Tw&ts.
I hope the Premier League refuse to have such clubs.
 
Last edited:

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
I can't see the appetite for it really. Does mean less dead-rubbers when 12th v 13th still matters a few weeks out, but we already have a huge gap between Champ and Prem and I can't see how this helps and can only assume there's a financial benefit.
As it stands 12th and 13th have. A great chance of play offs this season.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Should make it a 24 team round robin playoff.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top