Andrew (1 Viewer)

wingy

Well-Known Member
Depending on where you get your trusted news from that family is riddled with abuse suffered as well as the other way.
 

Sky_Blue_Daz

Well-Known Member
I'm sure its only a matter of time before the house of cards fall down around them all
 

Covkid1968#

Well-Known Member
He needs to face some sort of justice… absolute wrongun… does feel like the noose is starting to tighten.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Why the drip feed of photos and info out there. It's death by a thousand cuts just keeping it at the front of the news. Put it all out or not at all. Let those who have an interest judge with all of the facts and then either prosecute or move on. Bits being leaked by whoever it suits to do so for ages now and even then often with some redactions, where others have different interpretations of the reasons and what those redactions are.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Why the drip feed of photos and info out there. It's death by a thousand cuts just keeping it at the front of the news. Put it all out or not at all. Let those who have an interest judge with all of the facts and then either prosecute or move on. Bits being leaked by whoever it suits to do so for ages now and even then often with some redactions, where others have different interpretations of the reasons and what those redactions are.
It was offered through Raynor I believe who was advoting the royals to get ahead of it before the shit hits the fan from what I've read.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Why the drip feed of photos and info out there. It's death by a thousand cuts just keeping it at the front of the news. Put it all out or not at all. Let those who have an interest judge with all of the facts and then either prosecute or move on. Bits being leaked by whoever it suits to do so for ages now and even then often with some redactions, where others have different interpretations of the reasons and what those redactions are.
I think it’s down to the way in which the US government are publishing the information in a way to obscure what their guilty as fuck president has done in there. You have to go manually trawling through all of it in order to find out what’s what.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I think it’s down to the way in which the US government are publishing the information in a way to obscure what their guilty as fuck president has done in there. You have to go manually trawling through all of it in order to find out what’s what.
Agree. Although all the fake AI stuff people keep putting in him isn't helping. There's enough other stuff out there without the need to doctor stuff and it's hard picking through what's real and what isn't. Equally there are some like the other day where he's with women clearly old enough and he's a single guy around 30+ years ago that looks all fine and what anyone else would be doing. Need to separate that from the actual crimes. From the stuff seen so far Clinton looking even worse, but that's' probably what they're choosing to release.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Agree. Although all the fake AI stuff people keep putting in him isn't helping. There's enough other stuff out there without the need to doctor stuff and it's hard picking through what's real and what isn't. Equally there are some like the other day where he's with women clearly old enough and he's a single guy around 30+ years ago that looks all fine and what anyone else would be doing. Need to separate that from the actual crimes. From the stuff seen so far Clinton looking even worse, but that's' probably what they're choosing to release.
Well they’re desperate to take the heat off Trump who is the guiltiest man involved bar Epstein himself, so high profile cases will be what they focus on.

Bill Clinton I am sure has done heinous things which deserve punishment. But if Andrew has done them too, he mustn’t be above the law.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
From the stuff seen so far Clinton looking even worse, but that's' probably what they're choosing to release.
Shit like this doesn't help
The photo was released by the US Department of Justice and shows Clinton standing alongside Jackson and Ross, accompanied by three minors whose faces were redacted.

Its inclusion in the Epstein Files immediately raised alarm bells online, with some users wrongly suggesting the children were linked to Epstein's criminal activities. The image quickly became a lightning rod for speculation about alleged ties between Epstein and prominent public figures.

However, social media investigators later confirmed that the photograph was taken at a private fundraiser and does not depict any illegal activity. The children whose faces were obscured were not victims, but the sons of the singers.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Tries to hide as 'The Invisible Man', but signs off as A from Balmoral.

Silly c**t
 
Last edited:

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member


 
Last edited:

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Another release of the Epstein files today.

Sky News reading out some emails between Epstein and Andrew, a Russian model and dinner at BP was discussed.


There are also some titbits on Gates and Mandy. :ROFLMAO:
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
Self-entitled nonce - pure and simple. Invited Epstein to BP after he was initially released from prison. New images of him on all 4's over a lying girl.
But of course he did nothing wrong.
 

Sky_Blue_Daz

Well-Known Member
Self-entitled nonce - pure and simple. Invited Epstein to BP after he was initially released from prison. New images of him on all 4's over a lying girl.
But of course he did nothing wrong.
I seen the photos and got this vibe from it
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Self-entitled nonce - pure and simple. Invited Epstein to BP after he was initially released from prison. New images of him on all 4's over a lying girl.
But of course he did nothing wrong.
Petit, but not a girl if you look at the hands etc. I'm not defending him btw,definitely a wrongun, but think think a lot of tge tags and accusations are exaggerated.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Petit, but not a girl if you look at the hands etc. I'm not defending him btw,definitely a wrongun, but think think a lot of tge tags and accusations are exaggerated.
Read nobody’s girl if you can stomach it us men have a lot to answer for
Loads of good men and women knew what was going on but did fuck all and are as complicit in my book
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
He won’t be the only person
In the book it’s clear that many many rich and powerful people think it’s fine to do whatever you want so long as you pay
It’s awful
Trump is the guiltiest of them all, but Andrew only gained access to Epstein and then got off the hook because he was a royal. Not everyone can get the monarch to bail them out.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Trump is the guiltiest of them all, but Andrew only gained access to Epstein and then got off the hook because he was a royal. Not everyone can get the monarch to bail them out.
Trump only mentioned once and positively as out of all the rich wronguns he shunned Epstein in about 2007 or so
Power and money are insipid
I’m pleased there’s now a legal obligation on people to report any safeguarding issues it’s fuckin outrageous church and schools etc that should be the safest place have been found utterly wanting
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Trump only mentioned once and positively as out of all the rich wronguns he shunned Epstein in about 2007 or so
Power and money are insipid
I’m pleased there’s now a legal obligation on people to report any safeguarding issues it’s fuckin outrageous church and schools etc that should be the safest place have been found utterly wanting
No conflict of interest at all of course
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top