Andrew (2 Viewers)

wingy

Well-Known Member
Depending on where you get your trusted news from that family is riddled with abuse suffered as well as the other way.
 

Covkid1968#

Well-Known Member
He needs to face some sort of justice… absolute wrongun… does feel like the noose is starting to tighten.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Why the drip feed of photos and info out there. It's death by a thousand cuts just keeping it at the front of the news. Put it all out or not at all. Let those who have an interest judge with all of the facts and then either prosecute or move on. Bits being leaked by whoever it suits to do so for ages now and even then often with some redactions, where others have different interpretations of the reasons and what those redactions are.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Why the drip feed of photos and info out there. It's death by a thousand cuts just keeping it at the front of the news. Put it all out or not at all. Let those who have an interest judge with all of the facts and then either prosecute or move on. Bits being leaked by whoever it suits to do so for ages now and even then often with some redactions, where others have different interpretations of the reasons and what those redactions are.
It was offered through Raynor I believe who was advoting the royals to get ahead of it before the shit hits the fan from what I've read.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Why the drip feed of photos and info out there. It's death by a thousand cuts just keeping it at the front of the news. Put it all out or not at all. Let those who have an interest judge with all of the facts and then either prosecute or move on. Bits being leaked by whoever it suits to do so for ages now and even then often with some redactions, where others have different interpretations of the reasons and what those redactions are.
I think it’s down to the way in which the US government are publishing the information in a way to obscure what their guilty as fuck president has done in there. You have to go manually trawling through all of it in order to find out what’s what.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I think it’s down to the way in which the US government are publishing the information in a way to obscure what their guilty as fuck president has done in there. You have to go manually trawling through all of it in order to find out what’s what.
Agree. Although all the fake AI stuff people keep putting in him isn't helping. There's enough other stuff out there without the need to doctor stuff and it's hard picking through what's real and what isn't. Equally there are some like the other day where he's with women clearly old enough and he's a single guy around 30+ years ago that looks all fine and what anyone else would be doing. Need to separate that from the actual crimes. From the stuff seen so far Clinton looking even worse, but that's' probably what they're choosing to release.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Agree. Although all the fake AI stuff people keep putting in him isn't helping. There's enough other stuff out there without the need to doctor stuff and it's hard picking through what's real and what isn't. Equally there are some like the other day where he's with women clearly old enough and he's a single guy around 30+ years ago that looks all fine and what anyone else would be doing. Need to separate that from the actual crimes. From the stuff seen so far Clinton looking even worse, but that's' probably what they're choosing to release.
Well they’re desperate to take the heat off Trump who is the guiltiest man involved bar Epstein himself, so high profile cases will be what they focus on.

Bill Clinton I am sure has done heinous things which deserve punishment. But if Andrew has done them too, he mustn’t be above the law.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
From the stuff seen so far Clinton looking even worse, but that's' probably what they're choosing to release.
Shit like this doesn't help
The photo was released by the US Department of Justice and shows Clinton standing alongside Jackson and Ross, accompanied by three minors whose faces were redacted.

Its inclusion in the Epstein Files immediately raised alarm bells online, with some users wrongly suggesting the children were linked to Epstein's criminal activities. The image quickly became a lightning rod for speculation about alleged ties between Epstein and prominent public figures.

However, social media investigators later confirmed that the photograph was taken at a private fundraiser and does not depict any illegal activity. The children whose faces were obscured were not victims, but the sons of the singers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top