Transfer Rumour Frank Onyeka (22 Viewers)

FergieTheFinisher

Well-Known Member
Thing is you can’t just break your wage structure for one player

And we do have to consider the possibility we don’t go up. Maybe he would go for a promotion incentive based deal, but I imagine the likes of Valencia and Sheff Utd would be able to meet his demands off the bat.
Yeah but they don’t have Super Frankie Lampaaardddd!!
 

long way home

Well-Known Member
We need someone to plug the gap we leave when we lose the ball. Teams are just killing us when they play between the gap and break on the back 4.

Hopefully this is done and we then look to a LB and move on a few that will not get in our squad.
 
Last edited:

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Yeah he makes him sound amazing
he then say this

"
Can see why you want him, he wont shy away from tackles and will win the ball back... on the ball is the issue but your midfield should be able to make up for it. He isnt making our squad, I reckon this is done by thursday."

which would be valuable for tougher games
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
If we genuinely think he’s the key to turning it all around then let’s do it. But let’s not pretend there are easy fixes here, because by the sounds of it there are plenty of holes in his game, and plenty of other issues we’ve got to sort through non-transfer-related means.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
If we genuinely think he’s the key to turning it all around then let’s do it. But let’s not pretend there are easy fixes here, because by the sounds of it there are plenty of holes in his game, and plenty of other issues we’ve got to sort through non-transfer-related means.
no one is saying that, people are just saying for games like today having someone who will add defensive shield, fill gaps in the midfield when we lose the ball and win the ball back is valuable
 

baldy

Well-Known Member
If we genuinely think he’s the key to turning it all around then let’s do it. But let’s not pretend there are easy fixes here, because by the sounds of it there are plenty of holes in his game, and plenty of other issues we’ve got to sort through non-transfer-related means.

What do you mean? Like what?
 

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
I didn’t watch tonight but sounds like there were some pretty serious issues with how we set up tactically? Maybe I’m wrong though.
Yeah like being cut open in midfield

granted some horrific defensive errors too

it’s a signing that could make a big difference and in away games he’s definitely someone I’d be starting
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
If we genuinely think he’s the key to turning it all around then let’s do it. But let’s not pretend there are easy fixes here, because by the sounds of it there are plenty of holes in his game, and plenty of other issues we’ve got to sort through non-transfer-related means.
You don't need every player to be a playmaker. You need enablers in the team too.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
I didn’t watch tonight but sounds like there were some pretty serious issues with how we set up tactically? Maybe I’m wrong though.
First and foremost it was individual errors. No one can watch the 2nd goal and tell me it’s tactical.

If that’s tactical, MVE’s back pass v Sunderland was also a tactical error… 🙄
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
You don't need every player to be a playmaker. You need enablers in the team too.
While that certainly can be true, it’s also not true of how we’ve played and won most of our games this season. Again, maybe he’s our guy and we can change things up, but at this stage of the season it may not be the one simple trick it’s being billed as.

I want our form back to where it was as much as anyone, but forgive me for questioning if a player with “the first touch of a trampoline” is necessarily “exactly what we need”
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
While that certainly can be true, it’s also not true of how we’ve played and won most of our games this season. Again, maybe he’s our guy and we can change things up, but at this stage of the season it may not be the one simple trick it’s being billed as.

I want our form back to where it was as much as anyone, but forgive me for questioning if a player with “the first touch of a trampoline” is necessarily “exactly what we need”
We just lack athleticism and ball winning in midfield and feel that for balancing purposes, that gives us an edge.

We’ve been doing it all season, we regularly bring on Allen to see games out.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
While that certainly can be true, it’s also not true of how we’ve played and won most of our games this season. Again, maybe he’s our guy and we can change things up, but at this stage of the season it may not be the one simple trick it’s being billed as.

I want our form back to where it was as much as anyone, but forgive me for questioning if a player with “the first touch of a trampoline” is necessarily “exactly what we need”
I know, but things have moved on. Teams have got wise to us to an extent so we now need to counter that.
 

Bad Boy

Well-Known Member
I know, but things have moved on. Teams have got wise to us to an extent so we now need to counter that.
Exactly, if teams have sussed us then change it.
Trouble is I don't think we can, we don't have the personnel.
FLs response when asked in recent weeks as how to put things right is WORK, it's the only way I know.
He talks about the culture at the club with the squad wanting to learn, take on new ideas, working hard on the training ground.
I'm not seeing much evidence of that on match days since December.
 
Last edited:

SkyB

Well-Known Member
After last night 80% of posts on here are about how we got overrun in midfield and could put a challenge in.

A bloke with the nickname Frank the Tank is exactly what we need.

Doug, Dean and Frank are stupid, they all watched last night as well and saw where the gapping holes got opened.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Exactly, if teams have sussed us then change it.
Trouble is I don't think we can, we don't have the personnel.
FLs response when asked in recent weeks as how to put things right is WORK, it's the only way I know.
He talks about the culture at the club with the squad wanting to learn, take on new ideas, working hard on the training ground.
I'm not seeing much evidence of that on match days since December.
What else is he going to say? He isn't going to give out tactical information in interviews.

Just 2 games ago we changed shape mid game as the one we started with wasn't working, we have also played different formations away from home this season.

There is no evidence we won't change tactically and there's not a massive amount needed, Torp was set up far to high last night which left a big gap off the ball and Grimes isolated on the ball. Torp deeper means that gap isn't there and it also gives Grimes an option other than playing it long.

This couple with a midfielder at 10 who will support deeper than BTA who is basically a CF when he is asked to play 10 will hopefully give us a more solid base and better build up play options.
 

JSL

Well-Known Member
How many have actually seen this fella play? Theres lots of opinion that he is exactly what we need, but I didnt realise we had so many closet Brentford fans on here. Genuinely, have you seen him play or just looked at highlight reels and stats? £7m says we need to be sure...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SBT

Bad Boy

Well-Known Member
What else is he going to say? He isn't going to give out tactical information in interviews.

Just 2 games ago we changed shape mid game as the one we started with wasn't working, we have also played different formations away from home this season.

There is no evidence we won't change tactically and there's not a massive amount needed, Torp was set up far to high last night which left a big gap off the ball and Grimes isolated on the ball. Torp deeper means that gap isn't there and it also gives Grimes an option other than playing it long.

This couple with a midfielder at 10 who will support deeper than BTA who is basically a CF when he is asked to play 10 will hopefully give us a more solid base and better build up play options.
'm not questioning what his response is, I'm perfectly happy with it and I'm in total agreement.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
As I have posted before, forget Onyeka.

Birmingham City want him and they will outbid us on the transfer fee and wages. We just can't compete with them, which is why they were set to snatch Manneh from us until he failed his medical.
Any real evidence:

a) That they even want him that much, I don't accept them being tacked on to a few stories is actual evidence. The press use them to drive up clicks.

b) That we still wanted Manneh, the news was we had pulled out as we were not happy with something and decided Esse and Yang were they better bets long before blues thought they were signing him. The fella on here said we had pulled out as we had seen something iffy about him, so had the Greek team and seemingly now blues.
 

Skyblue Bangkok

Well-Known Member
Any real evidence:

a) That they even want him that much, I don't accept them being tacked on to a few stories is actual evidence. The press use them to drive up clicks.

b) That we still wanted Manneh, the news was we had pulled out as we were not happy with something and decided Esse and Yang were they better bets long before blues thought they were signing him. The fella on here said we had pulled out as we had seen something iffy about him, so had the Greek team and seemingly now blues.
Birmingham signed a winger today for £7 million quid plus
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top