I am deeply fed up with the sheer hypocricy of people complaining about the money flowing into Birmingham (who bailed us out) or Wrexham (delete where applicable) when we all know we would love either of their owners to take us over. Both those owners have considerably deeper pockets than DK and it is patently obvious that shit loads of money is far more important to success than even the best manager.* DK has enabled us to get forward, but if you want regular Prem football you need a moneybags. Please see Ipswich, Nottingham Forest and Sunderland passim
* There has also been some recent search that indicates that the quality of the manager is not a key variable to success - See Liam Manning and Thomas Frank for recent examples
Both of those owners have artificially inflated the market by throwing money at it, and thus denying clubs run on a more sustainable footing the opportunity. Owners pouring unlimited funds into clubs is just financial doping.
The FFP rules are there specifically to stop clubs doing this, though there are massive holes in the regulations.
You say 'we' would welcome either owner; that is a rather homogeneous word to use for such a disparate number of opinions. I would not wish either of these owners, both have made the clubs something that in no way appeals to me, are embarrassing in their different ways, and like BSB, I see any success they achieve as hollow.
I prefer success to be earned, not bought, but each to their own.
If you think I'm a hypocrite for this, then you don't understand what hypocrisy is (hey, I can be patronising too).
Oh, and Birmingham didn't 'bail us out;' they accepted a financial transaction that was beneficial to them.