You say 'allows', but if a team behaves like that, what can you do?No serious competition allows that and now senegal will go on to win probably , crazy
Refusing to play should mean you forfeit the match imoYou say 'allows', but if a team behaves like that, what can you do?
Senegal are going to be in big trouble after this. Some sort of ban, surely. Doesn't matter how aggrieved you feel, you can't behave like that.
Yeah. Think this is one of the only circumstances where that rule is actually relevant.Also shouldn't every Senegalese player who walked off the field of play without permission have had a booking?
Youd argue they forfeit the match leaving the field of play because they sulked during regulation timeYou say 'allows', but if a team behaves like that, what can you do?
Senegal are going to be in big trouble after this. Some sort of ban, surely. Doesn't matter how aggrieved you feel, you can't behave like that.
Isnt there a rule where 1 player must stay on the pitch otherwise the other team can kick off when a goals scored?Youd argue they forfeit the match leaving the field of play because they sulked during regulation time
keeper could have ran from the dr3ssing room and still got o to before it crossed the lineI think the ref could have allowed the penalty to be taken with the other team of the pitch and he'd still have missed
Yeah, that's probably fair.Youd argue they forfeit the match leaving the field of play because they sulked during regulation time
No.Will anybody ever respect senegal as legitimate winners here ?
Because its a deliberate act of foolishnessWhy do people insist that missed panenkas are worse than any other missed penalty?
Oh, go on then *edit, that wasn't the one you were on about as it? still funny as fuck though, leaving it up*Just made an awful decision, just like that Leicester player against Cardiff.
It'll have happened in club football more often than we think probably, but this will be the highest profile example for a very long time.Yeah, that's probably fair.
It's unprecedented, though. Never seen anything like it.
Isn’t it just someone trying to predict where the keeper will dive like most penalties do?Because its a deliberate act of foolishness
It's a bit more high risk because there's minimal power on the shot.Isn’t it just someone trying to predict where the keeper will dive like most penalties do?
If a keeper stays central for a panenka he will almost certainly save itIsn’t it just someone trying to predict where the keeper will dive like most penalties do?
Its cocky behaviour isnt it really , power if its down the middleIsn’t it just someone trying to predict where the keeper will dive like most penalties do?
UnrealHow has he missed?!
keeper hits on to the players foot just as he is shooting doesn't he?Unreal
This is a game that'll enter football folklore, absolutely bonkersUnreal
Its cocky behaviour isnt it really , power if its down the middle
Isn’t the (lack of) pace on the ball a deliberate attempt to stop the keeper from saving it mid-dive? It’s not inherently more or less likely to go in if you hit it hard and the keeper stays dead central, surely?If a keeper stays central for a panenka he will almost certainly save it
If you put some power on a pen then even if the keeper guesses right you still have a chance of scoring
Isn’t the (lack of) pace on the ball a deliberate attempt to stop the keeper from saving it mid-dive? It’s not inherently more or less likely to go in if you hit it hard and the keeper stays dead central, surely?
This, as it allows the keeper a chance to correct his actions and still save the pen. There's a reason you don't see it as much as more conventional penalties.Mendy went to go down amd had time to reorganise and adjust to save because of the poor power ..
It was cocky hence why its universally agreed his miss made him look a tit