Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (10 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It's good to see @SIR ERNIE laughing at this. Just shows what a vacuous, gurning, empty-headed vessel he truly is.

If you've got so something to say, then for God's sake say it and stop cowering behind laughing emojis. Are you worried you'll expose yourself as being a bit dim? Don't stress mate, that ship has long since sailed. 😄

In the meantime, this is what happens to 5' 4" (American) grandmothers when they go out to simply observe ICE. Thrown to the ground, arrested, taken away without telling anyone where she was going to be held, threatened, and they even cut off her wedding ring.

That's what happens when there's no due process, and no respect for the law, by those who are supposed to enforce the law.

Why the fuck would anyone with a third of a brain or an ounce of humanity cheer this on? I guess I've answered my own question.


Problem is people say things then you scuttle of and put them on ignore

You come across as some AI generated parody account

You really have inferiority issues as well - you need to address that
 

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
It's good to see @SIR ERNIE laughing at this. Just shows what a vacuous, gurning, empty-headed vessel he truly is.

If you've got so something to say, then for God's sake say it and stop cowering behind laughing emojis. Are you worried you'll expose yourself as being a bit dim? Don't stress mate, that ship has long since sailed. 😄

In the meantime, this is what happens to 5' 4" (American) grandmothers when they go out to simply observe ICE. Thrown to the ground, arrested, taken away without telling anyone where she was going to be held, threatened, and they even cut off her wedding ring.

That's what happens when there's no due process, and no respect for the law, by those who are supposed to enforce the law.

Why the fuck would anyone with a third of a brain or an ounce of humanity cheer this on? I guess I've answered my own question.


How the hell is stuff like this not causing uproar? Especially in the country it’s actually happening in.

ICE agents running roughshod isn’t new, this isn’t an isolated incident as we all know.

Madness.

I’m sure Trump will tell us the woman arrested has Somalian and Mexican heritage so it’s all fine.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
How the hell is stuff like this not causing uproar? Especially in the country it’s actually happening in.

ICE agents running roughshod isn’t new, this isn’t an isolated incident as we all know.

Madness.

I’m sure Trump will tell us the woman arrested has Somalian and Mexican heritage so it’s all fine.
Coupled with his attack on Europe with zero condemnation of Russia, the constant sucking up to 'daddy' by European leaders is sickening.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
How the hell is stuff like this not causing uproar? Especially in the country it’s actually happening in.

ICE agents running roughshod isn’t new, this isn’t an isolated incident as we all know.

Madness.

I’m sure Trump will tell us the woman arrested has Somalian and Mexican heritage so it’s all fine.
Feels like a ticking time bomb. A country armed to the teeth on the basis the general population may need to rise up against a tyrannical government.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
It's good to see @SIR ERNIE laughing at this. Just shows what a vacuous, gurning, empty-headed vessel he truly is.

If you've got so something to say, then for God's sake say it and stop cowering behind laughing emojis. Are you worried you'll expose yourself as being a bit dim? Don't stress mate, that ship has long since sailed. 😄

In the meantime, this is what happens to 5' 4" (American) grandmothers when they go out to simply observe ICE. Thrown to the ground, arrested, taken away without telling anyone where she was going to be held, threatened, and they even cut off her wedding ring.

That's what happens when there's no due process, and no respect for the law, by those who are supposed to enforce the law.

Why the fuck would anyone with a third of a brain or an ounce of humanity cheer this on? I guess I've answered my own question.

Think he spends some time over there, not sure how that pans out in the future?
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
Problem is people say things then you scuttle of and put them on ignore

You come across as some AI generated parody account

You really have inferiority issues as well - you need to address that
He does come across as a very weird one. He's clearly still carrying a grudge for me ridiculing his praise for Biden/Kamala some time back.

He seems to only post hilarious raging nonsense or factually incorrect crap.

Each of which qualifies for their own well earned appropriate emoji. Those emojis winds the fuck out of him.

His frothing reaction to Marty humorously asking 'where am I going?' when threatened with deportation was just priceless.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
He does come across as a very weird one. He's clearly still carrying a grudge for me ridiculing his praise for Biden/Kamala some time back.

He seems to only post hilarious raging nonsense or factually incorrect crap.

Each of which qualifies for their own well earned appropriate emoji. Those emojis winds the fuck out of him.

His frothing reaction to Marty humorously asking 'where am I going?' when threatened with deportation was just priceless.
The whole conversation was prompted by him laughing off the idea that a 3 year old should have legal representation in deportation proceedings because ‘they should be put on the first plane anyway’. If you don’t believe in due process for someone like that you’re actually opposing it for everyone because nobody gets the chance to defend themselves in court.

That point was never addressed by the people who find the story funny.
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
The whole conversation was prompted by him laughing off the idea that a 3 year old should have legal representation in deportation proceedings because ‘they should be put on the first plane anyway’. If you don’t believe in due process for someone like that you’re actually opposing it for everyone because nobody gets the chance to defend themselves in court.

That point was never addressed by the people who find the story funny.
Clearly no 3y-o should ever be put in that position.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Clearly no 3y-o should ever be put in that position.
Right, then extend that to any person not being allowed due process and you're allowing the state to get rid of anyone they don't like without the right to defend themselves. That's why it matters and that's really all duffer was saying.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Right, then extend that to any person not being allowed due process and you're allowing the state to get rid of anyone they don't like without the right to defend themselves. That's why it matters and that's really all duffer was saying.

Well no - he then went on some rant that posters are thick if they don’t side with him. He does it all the time.

I can’t even be bothered to read about this 3 year old incident but surely there are parents aren’t there?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Well no - he then went on some rant that posters are thick if they don’t side with him. He does it all the time.

I can’t even be bothered to read about this 3 year old incident but surely there are parents aren’t there?
A 3 year old was forced to be her own legal defence and this is your response? I am not surprised.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
The whole conversation was prompted by him laughing off the idea that a 3 year old should have legal representation in deportation proceedings because ‘they should be put on the first plane anyway’. If you don’t believe in due process for someone like that you’re actually opposing it for everyone because nobody gets the chance to defend themselves in court.

That point was never addressed by the people who find the story funny.
All sides are to blame for this travesty. It's not a new situation as it happened during his first term as well. It was also happening during Obama's Presidency. Democrats have had chances to remedy this when they held the White House but didn't do so. Under Biden 10000s of unaccompanied children without legal representation were issued deportation orders
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
All sides are to blame for this travesty. It's not a new situation as it happened during his first term as well. It was also happening during Obama's Presidency. Democrats have had chances to remedy this when they held the White House but didn't do so. Under Biden 10000s of unaccompanied children without legal representation were issued deportation orders
Yeah I'm sure most of this has been taken by Dems and modified to suit the shifting position.
Bit like Starmer here, not genuine in his position,need a radical approach.
The uni-party is a thing,and the media simply mostly right wing gets their diatribes through.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
All sides are to blame for this travesty. It's not a new situation as it happened during his first term as well. It was also happening during Obama's Presidency. Democrats have had chances to remedy this when they held the White House but didn't do so. Under Biden 10000s of unaccompanied children without legal representation were issued deportation orders
They can't have it both ways telling lies about the other side being 'soft on the border' when there's piles of evidence to the contrary. The difference I suppose is that the Democrats weren't ordering masked goons to snatch people off the street and bundle them off to God knows where.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Fucking hell. Stay classy Donald.




G8N8m0mWkAMFfE6
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Come to expect it when he isn't Creating scenarios in the news he can't resist chiming in with his view's, maybe have to get used to it while the Dems and the rest of the free world acts so tepidly in their resistance.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Fucking hell. Stay classy Donald.




G8N8m0mWkAMFfE6
He's definitely not wired right. How on earth many Americans (and even more fucked up, people outside of the USA) admire this man is beyond me. He's not right in the head. For a president to come out with that...it's a just wow moment.
 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member

 
Last edited:

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
There was an expert in international media law on the radio this morning and he reckons there is no way in hell that Trump's defamation claim will stand up in court, it's so full of holes. Apparently he is claiming that the BBC defamed his father by doctoring his speech. Schoolboy error - you can't defame the dead!

* Please note that i think what Panorama did was utterly reprehensible and they deserve to get a kicking for it!
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
All those high profile republicans who went after people bringing up politics when commenting on Charlie Kirk's murder, I assume they're also now outspoken with anger about Trump's comments on Reiner and not massive hypocrites sitting on their hands looking the other way.

He just can’t help himself and behaves like a scorned ex who just can’t let go of stuff said in the past. He should be embarrassed

To be fair, seen a fair few supporters pulling him up on it. Doubt it will make a blind bit of difference though.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
There was an expert in international media law on the radio this morning and he reckons there is no way in hell that Trump's defamation claim will stand up in court, it's so full of holes. Apparently he is claiming that the BBC defamed his father by doctoring his speech. Schoolboy error - you can't defame the dead!

* Please note that i think what Panorama did was utterly reprehensible and they deserve to get a kicking for it!
Some of the stuff he's claiming is absolutely nuts. A huge surge in VPN usage in Florida so people could watch it FFS.

As with many of his lawsuits he's banking on the other side not being willing / able to defend it and offering him a payoff instead.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Some of the stuff he's claiming is absolutely nuts. A huge surge in VPN usage in Florida so people could watch it FFS.

As with many of his lawsuits he's banking on the other side not being willing / able to defend it and offering him a payoff instead.
I take it he'll be filing lawsuits against FOX for editing out his Epstein comments last year then. As opposed to suing someone for showing him saying words he said, and giving them the intention he had.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
All those high profile republicans who went after people bringing up politics when commenting on Charlie Kirk's murder, I assume they're also now outspoken with anger about Trump's comments on Reiner and not massive hypocrites sitting on their hands looking the other way.


bafkreih3caqljj2mh6rcj57zljkgvn2j7hew4qdo3eeozcdeimepgd22we@jpeg


bafkreibbdykd5iagqbdpc4ynrcdyt7o6p3w7mrx46inegi6gu4cpvsq4sq@jpeg
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
All those high profile republicans who went after people bringing up politics when commenting on Charlie Kirk's murder, I assume they're also now outspoken with anger about Trump's comments on Reiner and not massive hypocrites sitting on their hands looking the other way.

Well, it is pretty stupid yes and the desire to make everything political in this fashion is wrong. Unless I'm missing something however, the two cases are entirely different given that Charlie Kirk was an active political speaker.

Given that most of the left on here couldn't wait 24 hours to start sticking the knife in on Kirk, I find the moral highground stand point here pretty silly really.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Unless I'm missing something however, the two cases are entirely different given that Charlie Kirk was an active political speaker.
Robert Norman Reiner (March 6, 1947 – December 14, 2025) was an American film director, producer, screenwriter, actor, and political activist.

Reiner was a liberal activist. He was a co-founder of the American Foundation for Equal Rights, which initiated the court challenge against California Proposition 8 that banned same-sex marriage in the state.

In 1998, Reiner chaired the campaign to pass California Proposition 10, the California Children and Families Initiative, which created First 5 California, a program of early childhood development services funded by a tax on tobacco products. He served as the organization's first chairman from 1999 to 2006. His lobbying, particularly as an anti-smoking advocate, led to his likeness being used satirically in the South Park episode "Butt Out", where he was depicted as a morbidly obese, hypocritical tyrant.

Reiner came under criticism for campaigning for Proposition 82, a ballot measure to fund public preschools, while serving as chair of the First 5 Commission. He resigned from his position on March 29, 2006. An audit later concluded that the commission had not violated state law and had clear legal authority to conduct public advertising campaigns related to preschool. However, the auditor reported that the commission awarded more than $77 million in media contracts without reviewing their costs. Proposition 82 ultimately failed to win approval.

Reiner was a member of the Social Responsibility Task Force, an organization advocating moderation where social issues such as violence and tobacco use intersect with the entertainment industry. He was also active in environmental causes, successfully leading the effort to preserve California's Ahmanson Ranch as a state park and wildlife refuge rather than as a commercial real estate development. In July 2007, he introduced the reunited Spinal Tap at the London Live Earth concert.

Reiner was mentioned as a possible candidate to run against California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006 but declined for personal reasons. He was quoted as saying "I don't want to be an elected official, I want to get things done." He campaigned extensively for Democratic presidential nominee Al Gore in the 2000 presidential election, and he campaigned in Iowa for Democratic candidate Howard Dean ahead of the 2004 Iowa caucuses. He endorsed Hillary Clinton in the 2008 election, and in 2015 donated $10,000 to Correct the Record, a political action committee supporting her 2016 presidential campaign. After the 2016 election, Reiner continued to campaign against Donald Trump, calling him racist, sexist, anti-gay, and antisemitic. He remarked that Harvey Weinstein is a "bad guy" but that Trump was "also an abuser".

Reiner served on the advisory board of the Committee to Investigate Russia. He and David Frum launched the site in September 2017, accompanied by a video narrated by Morgan Freeman warning that "We are at war" and that Russia had attacked the United States. Other advisory board members at the time of launch included James Clapper, Max Boot, Charles Sykes, and Norman Ornstein. By November 2020, the board also included Evelyn Farkas, Michael Hayden, Michael Morrell, Leon Panetta, and Clint Watts.

Reiner endorsed Joe Biden for president in the 2020 United States presidential election. In June 2021, Reiner announced he was developing a television project, The Spy and the Asset, about the relationship between Trump and Vladimir Putin. He said the series would explore the leaders' childhoods and trace their lives up to the point where they intersect. Reiner said he was collaborating with writer Ward Parry on the project.

In September 2025, Reiner gave an interview with CNN, where he spoke out against Trump and the Federal Communications Commission. He said it "may be the last time you ever see me", in reference to the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top