shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Didn't know anything about him other than I knew him from the BBC so I've got no baggage with him. Just reads like evidence of why the left hardly ever gets power incl. his voice and writing style and perspective.
Feels biased towards Starmer and co. when he's writing that 'Labour is on target to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029'. Is it? If his aim was to remind you that left wing politics is still the Life of Brian, fair enough.
It read like a hurried and long winded defence of Starmer which... meh. He's right that a new party with Jezza and Zarah at the helm will be a mess. I'm hoping they'll do the organising at scale part and get good leaders.
The relevant bits are the inside politics bits about the left which he knows very well as he was part of Corbyn 1.0. These parties like Labour under Corbyn always end up as the latest vehicle for decades old rows between old leftists. The aim to “unite the working class and racialised communities” is frankly ludicrous and pretends that reform voters will vote for open borders if you just make them join a union at work.
As he points out those old leftists will have their feet under the table well before any membership.
But the last bit is the most important:
The strategic consequence will be to split the progressive vote, at the precise moment it will need to unite to stave off the one problem nobody in the Corbyn/Sultana movement wants to engage with: the mass radicalisation of people towards racism and fascism.
There is a self-deluding argument coming out of the far left, that says Starmer has somehow fuelled Reform’s rise, by acknowledging the challenges of immigration. Unfortunately, Reform doesn’t need any help: it is riding a real and virulent radicalisation, that’s being driven on social media and by ludicrously lax regulation of broadcasting.
The radicalisation of working class people towards the far right is the strategic problem – meaning that a left wing party that wants to govern has to do three things:
That’s what Labour actually did on 4 July 2024. It took the battle into small working class towns in the north and Midlands – something that the Corbyn/Sultana Party has no intention of doing (and neither do the Greens).
- Unite progressives around a common set of social objectives, so that we can start delivering redistributive justice to the communities where fascism is growing;
- Defend the rights of minorities, by restoring trust in democracy and damping down the rhetoric of hate and extremism that is trying to consume society
- And reach out into the communities where social conservatism and despair are growing with sensible, redistributive policies designed to win them away from Reform.
So my question to people attracted to Your Party is: do you want to sit in a self-created political ghetto, of graduates and “racialised people”? Or are you prepared to join the fight to defend democracy from Reform and the fascists, and defend Britain from foreign aggression. It’s not a new question - it’s a rerun of the question working class people faced in the 1930s.
This is existential shit guys. The alternative to Labour is fascism. Now is not the time to split the left.
The fact supposedly left wing posters on here spend ten time as much energy attacking Starmer as they do Farage is why my patience with them is wearing thin tbh. At some point you’re not an ironic cool guy you’re just a useful idiot.