Transfer Rumour 25/26 Summer Transfer Window (47 Viewers)

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Injured at Leicester, full season at Norwich and both managers saw enough in him to play at right back which is not his best position just to get him in the team. Buying Doyle, if affordable would be similar to a Rolex in as much as it would be cash neutral with the chance of making a good profit. For someone like Doug thats the cold sort of business decisions he likes and the kid is desperate for a stable club rather than loans. Like I said before though it aint my money.PUSB

Was injured for a bit but he was in the squad for 30 games and played 17.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
If he wasn't at Man City and instead had come through the academy of a team like Norwich he wouldn't be more than £4-5m. I was impressed with him in the home game against Norwich last season but wouldn't pay any more than £5m for him.

Exactly this you’re paying the Man City tax. The same sort of tax that lead to Palmer and Dasilva being worth millions.
 

peteCCFC

Well-Known Member
If he wasn't at Man City and instead had come through the academy of a team like Norwich he wouldn't be more than £4-5m. I was impressed with him in the home game against Norwich last season but wouldn't pay any more than £5m for him.
Haha! He's 21, played 150 career games in this league, represented England youth levels up to the u23s and has played for top Championship sides. We just sold Binks for 3 million, Doyle is worth far more than that!
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Haha! He's 21, played 150 career games in this league, represented England youth levels up to the u23s and has played for top Championship sides. We just sold Binks for 3 million, Doyle is worth far more than that!

By this logic Joel Latibeaudiere is worth £15m
 

mark82

Super Moderator
Haha! He's 21, played 150 career games in this league, represented England youth levels up to the u23s and has played for top Championship sides. We just sold Binks for 3 million, Doyle is worth far more than that!
In fairness, £5m is more than £3m. I don't think he's worth £10m though, and we can't afford £10m on a defender so it's moot anyway. A loan with an option/obligation to buy if promoted is entirely possible though.
 

Briles

Well-Known Member
He might be, just not convinced he's the answer to the problem we have i.e. too many goals conceded from quick transitions. Feels like we need a CB with pace to push Thomas and Kitching. Is Doyle quick?
When was the last time we had a centre back with pace? Rose is the only one I can think of. Pacy CBs tend to play in the prem
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
Pacy CBs tend to play in the prem

Agree, so we can loan one from that league or find one with the potential to get there and enough experience to be able to start games straight away i.e. an MVE type signing at CB. If we can't find a good CB with a bit of pace for a few £m, I'd be disappointed.
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
There is probably a deal to be done for Doyle if he wants the move. Man City use selling youngsters to balance the books, they often sell early and build in clauses so they can get them back later. I'm sure there is a creative way the deal could be structured to make it work for both sides.
 

Gibbo

Well-Known Member
I thought Doyle the best central defender the City have had for quite a while (Big Mo maybe). And a really good passer - that ball to Vik against Millwall. Precision.

#10m is over the top but it's a negotiation. There may be better in the market for less, but who? Central defence was my number one priority so it would suit me. Can't see it though.

Getting rid of Binks = a real bonus. Others will know more but I thought the story was that fee when we bought him was peanuts but his wages were extortionate. This helped cash flow. In which case I am not sure how we can know whether it was profitable or not. For what its worth I thought he had promise but terrible positional sense - he fancied himself as a left winger sometimes
 

theskyisthelimit

Well-Known Member
I thought Doyle the best central defender the City have had for quite a while (Big Mo maybe). And a really good passer - that ball to Vik against Millwall. Precision.

#10m is over the top but it's a negotiation. There may be better in the market for less, but who? Central defence was my number one priority so it would suit me. Can't see it though.

Getting rid of Binks = a real bonus. Others will know more but I thought the story was that fee when we bought him was peanuts but his wages were extortionate. This helped cash flow. In which case I am not sure how we can know whether it was profitable or not. For what its worth I thought he had promise but terrible positional sense - he fancied himself as a left winger sometimes
Would you not class Dann in that bracket? I think he was such a good CB for us and throughout his career too to be fair
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I thought Doyle the best central defender the City have had for quite a while (Big Mo maybe). And a really good passer - that ball to Vik against Millwall. Precision.

#10m is over the top but it's a negotiation. There may be better in the market for less, but who? Central defence was my number one priority so it would suit me. Can't see it though.

Getting rid of Binks = a real bonus. Others will know more but I thought the story was that fee when we bought him was peanuts but his wages were extortionate. This helped cash flow. In which case I am not sure how we can know whether it was profitable or not. For what its worth I thought he had promise but terrible positional sense - he fancied himself as a left winger sometimes
Big Mo 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Doyle wasn't even the best centre back at the club while he was here
 

Cov4Ever

Well-Known Member
Think a centre back deal is nearly done.

No way we would let Binks go without a replacement being ready. Will they be in over the next few days ready for the last friendly match on Saturday?
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Think a centre back deal is nearly done.

No way we would let Binks go without a replacement being ready. Will they be in over the next few days ready for the last friendly match on Saturday?

not certainly. If 2.5m was offered and it came up quite quickly then you just have to take it and figure the rest out later. 2.5m for binks and making a profit is undoubtedly great business for us.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
He played around half the games he was available for Leicester. We were a mid table side like Norwich. We still are.

Doyle was out injured for four months at Leicester. It's not like he wasn't good enough to make their team.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Besiktas are going to push hard to get MVE apparently. I feel his sale will trigger the next lot of signings for us.


Hope there are no significant outgoings in the window now, fringe players OK but at this point it's better to hold on to core squad members like MVE.
 

Cov4Ever

Well-Known Member
not certainly. If 2.5m was offered and it came up quite quickly then you just have to take it and figure the rest out later. 2.5m for binks and making a profit is undoubtedly great business for us.
It's brilliant business by Doug. I can see us bringing a good solidly reliable first choice CB in but not Doyle. Loan to buy would be advisable not 10 mil straight off.
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
He might be, just not convinced he's the answer to the problem we have i.e. too many goals conceded from quick transitions. Feels like we need a CB with pace to push Thomas and Kitching. Is Doyle quick?
The greatest centre backs of all time havnt been quick. Bullshit you need to be quick to be a great centre back.

Doyles ball down the line to Gyokores for the quick break leading to Hamer goal at Wembley. Was a goal of beauty.

The lad oozes class. If we can get him for around £6m that wpukd be great business.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
you need to be quick to be a great centre back.

Don't disagree, just think that for how we play now we need some pace at the back, that it would give us something we don't have and might solve an issue that we need to address (goals against on the break). We're nothing like the side he played in three years ago so I don't see that as massively relevant.
 

procdoc

Well-Known Member
This notion that you need to be rapid to be a good centre half is bullshit peddled by people that have never played the game.
I would rather have a slower centre half who can read the game and is excellent positionally than a quick centre half who struggles with those attributes
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
This notion that you need to be rapid to be a good centre half is bullshit peddled by people that have never played the game.
II would rather have a slower centre half who can read the game and is excellent positionally than a quick centre half who struggles with those attributes
And what level have you played at out of curiosity?

In this high line system lampard plays, it would be pretty silly to not target a CB with pace.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top