Manchester Airport Incident (7 Viewers)

[GIMOC]

No list in the link and no breakdown of the ethnicity or religious affiliation of the forces involved. It's hard to trust your number crunching on this one. 80% sounds like a number you used because it's used a lot.

so anything between 60 to 80 % according to which source you use

so please stop making a fool of yourself

 

---

[chiefdave]

again I’ll remind you

if you seen a video of group of white people outside a hotel shouting get the motherfuckers. you would be fine with that and say they are entitled to their opinion?

Fucking hell, didn't think I could make it much clearer.

You need to stop confusing what I personally think with the law.

I personally think anyone shouting 'get the motherfuckers' is an idiot. Doesn't matter if its someone outside a police station, someone outside a hotel or someone shouting it over the fence in the CBS car park.

However my personal thoughts don't dictate how the law works.

 

[mmttww]

takes all of 5 mins to work out how many of those countries have a vast majority of Muslim population

Does it? Looking up close to 100 countries mentioned in there and checking their religlious make up via a reputable source might take Johnny Five that long but I doubt you did that. You want it to be 80%, you want it to 'the Muslims', and you shared a link you found thinking 'slam dunk'. We get it.

 

[GIMOC]

Does it? Looking up close to 100 countries mentioned in there and checking their religlious make up via a reputable source might take Johnny Five that long but I doubt you did that. You want it to be 80%, you want it to 'the Muslims', and you shared a link you found thinking 'slam dunk'. We get it.

look above you lemon. it’s there in black and white unless sources are not good enough for you and if your maths isn’t great 22 out of 28 is 80%

 

[SkyBlueDom26]

Fair play to the police officer, after seeing what them lads did in the build up to the innocent he should have booted him harder. Good way to deal with bullies

 

[SkyBlueDom26]

Fuck me do you not get bored of posting Gif’s, embarrassing really

 

[mmttww]

look above you lemon. it’s there in black and white unless sources are not good enough for you and if your maths isn’t great 22 out of 28 is 80%

You managed to get an AI generated search result summary to give you the answer you wanted. You might be right, you might be twisting the word 'involve' to suit your point. I'm not fussed.

You've done a good job of proving that you want to talk about the Manchester incident because it's a chance to rant about Muslims. Just start an 'Islam is bad' thread and get on with it. Keep it simple.

 

[GIMOC]

You managed to get an AI generated search result summary to give you the answer you wanted. You might be right, you might be twisting the word 'involve' to suit your point. I'm not fussed.

You've done a good job of proving that you want to talk about the Manchester incident because it's a chance to rant about Muslims. Just start an 'Islam is bad' thread and get on with it. Keep it simple.

lol I don’t put the data in

AI is there to gather the info

you really hate facts being presented to you. god help you in the real world

must be strange living in your fantasy world or more likely living under a carpet where you hate being proved wrong

 

[mmttww]

god help you in the real world

or Allah, maybe. I'll take the help wherever!

 

[Sick Boy]

lol I don’t put the data in

AI is there to gather the info

you really hate facts being presented to you. god help you in the real world

must be strange living in your fantasy world or more likely living under a carpet where you hate being proved wrong

The AI results are often wrong.

 

[GIMOC]

The AI results are often wrong.

they’re wrong when it doesn’t fit your narrative

if they backed it up you would be all over them and that’s a fact

 

[Sick Boy]

they’re wrong when it doesn’t fit your narrative

if they backed it up you would be all over them and that’s a fact

No, they are actually often wrong.

 

[GIMOC]

No, they are actually often wrong.

as I said, when it suits

because you can’t or don’t want to believe something even if the facts are in front of you, doesn’t mean it’s not true

 

[shmmeee]

lol I don’t put the data in

AI is there to gather the info

you really hate facts being presented to you. god help you in the real world

must be strange living in your fantasy world or more likely living under a carpet where you hate being proved wrong

You absolutely do put the data in, by prompting AI you are specifying what answer you want. No idea if that’s the case here but don’t just blindly trust whatever a chatbot spits out.

 

[Sick Boy]

as I said, when it suits

because you can’t or don’t want to believe something even if the facts are in front of you, doesn’t mean it’s not true

 

[GIMOC]

You absolutely do put the data in, by prompting AI you are specifying what answer you want. No idea if that’s the case here but don’t just blindly trust whatever a chatbot spits out.

I’ve showed numerous links and then asked Google for info

what makes me laugh when you present the info all of sudden it’s wrong because it doesn’t suit the narrative

people can see it in black and white and to claim it’s wrong makes their argument look even weaker.

I got asked to prove it, I did in numerous ways and still get shot down. it’s amazing how people can’t take the truth

 

[GIMOC]

View attachment 44278

and? Probably got more brain cells than you going by that

I do love how people make themselves look silly when they can’t back counteract a discussion

not one person has countered my claims because they can’t

 

[Sick Boy]

I

I’ve showed numerous links and then asked Google for info

what makes me laugh when you present the info all of sudden it’s wrong because it doesn’t suit the narrative

people can see it in black and white and to claim it’s wrong makes their argument look even weaker.

I got asked to prove it, I did in numerous ways and still get shot down. it’s amazing how people can’t take the truth

It’s got nothing to do about a narrative. They’re often wrong and it’s been widely highlighted.

 

[Sick Boy]

and? Probably got more brain cells than you going by that

I do love how people make themselves look silly when they can’t back counteract a discussion

not one person has countered my claims because they can’t

Hahaha fair enough if you believe they can actually do that.

 

[GIMOC]

I

It’s got nothing to do about a narrative. They’re often wrong and it’s been widely highlighted.

yes it has

if what I said was false someone by now could dispute it but not one person has

that says it all to me

 

[mmttww]

No, they are actually often wrong.

Enjoyed the bloke that Googled himself casually for a LOL and got an AI result that told him he was dead.

 

[Nick]

Surely the answer is to specify the actual data going into it before it summarises and see what happens? It isn't hard.

 

[Joy Division]

Just a word of caution to those using Google and 'sources' to prove facts. Always check the dates on those sources that AI provide

 

[rob9872]

Just a word of caution to those using Google and 'sources' to prove facts. Always check the dates on those sources that AI provide

Paul Simon's song wouldn't have had the same ring to it.

 

[mmttww]

not one person has countered my claims...

It's funny to read your stuff for a while but then it gets boring, then it's fun to watch you claiming the pwns, but then that gets boring. I reckon that's where we're at. Feel free to celebrate, though!

 

[fernandopartridge]

go on. enlighten me? Scotland Yard is HQ not a holding place with cells

No, it's only the HQ of the Metropolitan police, home of the real authority within the Met. Not Reg Hollis down at Sun Hill or wherever.

 

[wingy]

No, it's only the HQ of the Metropolitan police, home of the real authority within the Met. Not Reg Hollis down at Sun Hill or wherever.

Too woke then!🫣

 

[Sky_Blue_Dreamer]

so anything between 60 to 80 % according to which source you use

so please stop making a fool of yourself

View attachment 44274

Would you care to include the actual question you asked google to get that answer, as you seem to have quite handily cut it from the screenshot.

 

[rob9872]

Would you care to include the actual question you asked google to get that answer, as you seem to have quite handily cut it from the screenshot.

"Please show me a list of examples of all wars where around 80% of them were caused by Muslims"

 

[chiefdave]

Would you care to include the actual question you asked google to get that answer, as you seem to have quite handily cut it from the screenshot.

Figured I'd give it a go.

 

[SIR ERNIE]

How can I put this politely. You are buying into the narrative of a racist idiot, so yes, it matters.

Of course it matters where you get the content from - do you believe everything you read? You should be concerned about who you're using to give you your world view, and what that says about you.

I'm going to say this again, because depressingly, it never seems to stick.

If you think all Muslims are the same (and let's not pretend you're thinking of them being all the same in a positive way) you are a racist.

So, what is your issue with Muslims, mate? What "wrongdoing" is it that you and Tommy think that they are all guilty of, that the rest of us are ignoring?

Do you ever contribute to a thread without resorting to calling someone a racist?

 

[Grendel]

Yes and it's being investigated.

Every shooting will be. The key is if criminal charges are bought, not sure they were? Can you confirm?

 

[Grendel]

I'm not sure, but how can you safely shoot someone when they're grappling with police officers (or anyone)?

And anyway, police just can't shoot an unarmed man. I can't believe this is even a question tbh.

Police clearly can shoot an unarmed man. That’s been now established.

As for not being sure there was no violence before I’m astonished you haven’t read about court proceedings.

 

[PVA]

Police clearly can shoot an unarmed man. That’s been now established.

As for not being sure there was no violence before I’m astonished you haven’t read about court proceedings.

*they can't shoot an unarmed man except in the most exceptional circumstances.

Fucking hell.

I'm amazed there aren't literally hundreds of people being gunned down by the police every day given how lax the rules apparently are.

 

[Grendel]

*they can't shoot an unarmed man except in the most exceptional circumstances.

Fucking hell.

I'm amazed there aren't literally hundreds of people being gunned down by the police every day given how lax the rules apparently are.

What I’m amazed at is you didn’t consider this behaviour to potentially warrant that and are whining that someone tried to stamp on the blokes head

Fuck around and find out is pretty accurate