Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Saw x saying it’s ok as she was there
But she was targeted and attacked
Slightly different
Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter tisza
- Start date
Saw x saying it’s ok as she was there
But she was targeted and attacked
Slightly different
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
The dude turns around, takes aim and fires. Nothing random about it
SkyBlueCharlie9
Well-Known Member
You didn't complain that much when the right wing racist fruitcakes were rioting and attacking the police and ambulance staff last summer.
SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
People on this thread are that stupid they probably believe it
mmttww
Well-Known Member
add some caps. and that's a good band name!
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
SIR ERNIE
Well-Known Member
Refreshing to see that in the midst of all the left wing rioting and violence, there's at least one Democrat who's not afraid to point out that in the eyes of the electorate, the Dems are clearly on the wrong side:
<However, John Fetterman, the Democrat senator for Pennsylvania, has criticised his party for failing to call out “anarchy and true chaos”, which have seen cars torched and shops looted.
“My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement,” he said.>
<However, John Fetterman, the Democrat senator for Pennsylvania, has criticised his party for failing to call out “anarchy and true chaos”, which have seen cars torched and shops looted.
“My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement,” he said.>
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
If they had rioted to stop Trump taking office would it have been legal?
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
Pardon?Apparantly mental gymnastics works both ways.
How big do you think the sentences for LA rioters and looters should be? One of the J6 sentences was 18 years.
Apparantly mental gymnastics works both ways.
How big do you think the sentences for LA rioters and looters should be? One of the J6 sentences was 18 years.
Thanks for proving my point
SBAndy
Well-Known Member
Apparantly mental gymnastics works both ways.
How big do you think the sentences for LA rioters and looters should be? One of the J6 sentences was 18 years.
Failing to see how it’s a crime tbh, they’re just trying to protect their country.
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
It must have taken some mental gymnastics to justify that thought.
So, do you think looters and rioters in LA are justified and should not receive punishments. You seem rather quiet on the point.
I think anyone who breaks the law should be punished accordingly.
I'm not the one pardoning criminals, that's your side.
If letting criminal behaviour off the hook is a real issue for you then you must be furious with the orange idiot.
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
Outgoing President refuses to honour due process and Incites his followers to try to overthrow the transfer of power by violent means including attacks on law enforcement.It must have taken some mental gymnastics to justify that thought.
So, do you think looters and rioters in LA are justified and should not receive punishments. You seem rather quiet on the point.
Same President now back in power, refuses to honour due process and instructs his agents to arrest and detain random citizens and (again not following due process) sends in the military to quash the violent resistance to his constitution defying measures.
Do you see both the difference and the common denominator now?
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
After he'd incited them to *checks notes* 'fight like hell'...
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
To be clear, this is what ended up happening because he wanted to overturn an election that he fairly lost. Was it right for these criminals and the man who incited their violence to get away with it?
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
His words were far more nnuanced than your simplistic black and white view.
Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?
Read this article it is more balanced.
By the way Trump was not impeached for inciting violence and if he did he should have been.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
He said last year that it was his right to interfere with the election. He should be in prison, not the White House, yet goes on about law and order with no sense of irony
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Yeah mate, you are smarter than the whole US judicial system and know better than the US electorate, I get it.
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
There's nothing ambiguous about his promotion of 'stop the steal'. Nor is there about his aforementioned 'fight like hell' address on the day of Biden's inauguration.
Please dispense with this nonsense.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
What? He actively tried to interfere in the 2020 election, that’s undisputed.Yeah mate, you are smarter than the whole US judicial system and know better than the US electorate, I get it.
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
I know you understand everything better than anyone else but a Federal judge has ruled otherwise. Perhaps you could put him or her right.
mmttww
Well-Known Member
LA protests live: National Guard troops deployed as legal battle rages
California Governor Gavin Newsom blasts the federal government's response to anti-immigration raid protests as "purposefully inflammatory".
www.bbc.co.uk
Some of his rhetoric at this rally (at Fort Bragg, in front of a load of soldiers) is properly f*cking frightening. Feels like a prelude to martial law. Fanning the flames to justify dialling things up.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
it clearly wasn't though, he clearly just said it wasn't "under siege".
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
I know you understand everything better than anyone else but a Federal judge has ruled otherwise. Perhaps you could put him or her right.
They'll just appeal it, perhaps someone could put you right on how the US court system works.
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
I believe a hearing is scheduled on Thursday, in the meantime maybe you should check out the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
As if you have any idea what that says without googling it.I believe a hearing is scheduled on Thursday, in the meantime maybe you should check out the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007.
But if you want to talk about that act then what constitutional rights have the people of California been denied?
You can not on good faith claim that protesting against illegal acts (denial of constitutional rights and due process etc.) is "opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws"
Sorry fella, you'd be best not just parroting lines you from people on twitter about things you don't grasp.
duffer
Well-Known Member
Total hysterical nonsense from the Trump fanboy, as usual.
No one is destroying communities, LA is not in flames. The LAPD did not request help from the National Guard or the Marines, and neither did they need it to bring the situation under control.
If you'd bother to pay attention to the actual facts, you might notice that the National Guard have basically been stood around or inside Federal buildings, and the Marines haven't done anything at all.
You're embarrassing yourself mate, either try keeping up with the actual news or go back to low level trolling by just posting dancing Trump gifs, it's more your level.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
he's a weird one that kid