CBS issues (5 Viewers)

stupot07

Well-Known Member
The thing is, Wasps will need a safe playable surface as well for when their season starts, think a lot of people are overlooking this fact when they say they couldn’t give a fuck about it.

The fact there’s been an independent agronomist inspecting the pitch and deeming it unsafe will have them a lot more worried than before.
But they have more than enough time to rectify the pitch before their first game. Without being played on the pitch would be back to perfect condition before 17th September for their first home game.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
No it isn't, you agree with Wasps that given they can't invest in the pitch you will invest some of the rent in it, no court needs to be involved in basic commercial negotiation

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Absolutely

Any real CEO would way up benefits and risks.

We were told the two respective occupants of the role were on good terms

The problem would have been obvious months ago. The football club could have negotiated at that point. It didn’t have to be a total new pitch but a solution that would make the pitch workable. The clubs could have worked together and negotiated a sensible solution to benefit both parties.

If the football club did a proper risk valuation analysis on the situation it’s clear that they will be the ones this will have a potentially disastrous impact on - in fact almost to the point of zero income for weeks on end.

So a worked solution would easily have been achieved where up front costs are negotiated and long term rental adjustments made.

No normal companies would act like spoilt children sending strongly worded statements on their websites

It’s pathetic
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
I know demonstrations, banners etc. have been poo-poohed on here but surely we've got to do something?

At the very least to apply some pressure on all parties and provide some more negative exposure? I'm slightly concerned that the WMCA might bail them out with the £13m for the "good of Coventry's sporting clubs".
 

Nick

Administrator
Literally just seen somebody say (A CCFC Fan)

"Why would Wasps fix the pitch for SISU when they want to own the stadium"
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Did the club really know months ago it would be this bad? They knew it wasn’t being relaid but I’m not sure why people are jumping from that to they knew it would be unsafe to play a game on.

This was the pitch a few weeks ago, if someone had posted that on here at the time and said the first 3 games would be off as the pitch would be deemed to dangerous to play on I suspect the response would have been that the pitch was fine and they were a bedwetter

 

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
Well, given a sports club is a cultural asset, so assisting them in getting a ground when they run into financial trouble, rather than making it a business deal first and foremost. Further to that, making sure the rent is not set at an eye watering £1m+ commercial terms but something more realistic in order to help the sports club survive and thrive, as you recognise the benefits a sporting club with heritage brings to the city, assisting them with purchasing land with training facilities to improve the club's standing, and therefore the city's profile...

The list can go on.
 

Johnnythespider

Well-Known Member
Did the agronomists say when it would be safe and playable, did they provide an action plan to get the pitch into a playable state, if so why can't we be told this information ?
 

robbiethemole

Well-Known Member
Then they let the buffaloes loose on it, perhaps if Wasps had looked after it during the CWG it might have been somewhere near, but they chose to let it suffer and now hopefully the fuckers will pay the price
 

robbiethemole

Well-Known Member
Well, given a sports club is a cultural asset, so assisting them in getting a ground when they run into financial trouble, rather than making it a business deal first and foremost. Further to that, making sure the rent is not set at an eye watering £1m+ commercial terms but something more realistic in order to help the sports club survive and thrive, as you recognise the benefits a sporting club with heritage brings to the city, assisting them with purchasing land with training facilities to improve the club's standing, and therefore the city's profile...

The list can go on.
Accepted then, but when said sports club is practically insolvent,who in their right mind would give them £13m from public funds
 

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
I know demonstrations, banners etc. have been poo-poohed on here but surely we've got to do something?

At the very least to apply some pressure on all parties and provide some more negative exposure? I'm slightly concerned that the WMCA might bail them out with the £13m for the "good of Coventry's sporting clubs".
State aid for sure and back to court
 

steve cooper

Well-Known Member
I said in post 997 back on 6th August, this was a potential disaster for us.
With the weather we have had to compound the problem it's not going to change any time soon.
 

Perryccfc

Well-Known Member
Just a thought but would/could Wasps, CCFC, and EFL not come to an arrangement where the EFL assists with pitch renovation? Obviously not outright paying for a new pitch, but maybe assisting with interim ground staff to help bring the pitch to standards? Surely it’s in the EFL interest to get the pitch playable ASAP.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
Let’s face it. It’s been a disaster ever since we left Highfield Road. Absolute mess.

We also need to be clear that Sisu can’t afford to build a new stadium and they also don’t have the money to take the arena off wasps.

It isn’t any surprise that article turned up in The Times business section in regards for a buyer to take the club and the arena at the same time. Sisu have known for a while these issues were boiling over with Wasps. This is going to be a turbulent season with these shenanigans.

My enthusiasm for this season is over before it even began. A real shame for fans ultimately.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
We should relay it and not sign players..

Fucking next level bollocks
Look we've done it before and sold players while we were in Northampton that was a gesture I think with nothing back.
If it was at the CBS it would be done on a contra basis against the rent, probably a 1st quarter payment holiday.
The wish for them to die off and pack up was always going to end up with something like this occurring. It's not a given but it may suit the owners that this has cropped more than the team anyway.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Can't see Wasps agreeing with that. They probably want every penny they can get. We're clearly not a priority
Tbf that organisation might just decide it's not worth the risk due to all the publity regardless of whether it's a good pitch or not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AOM

wingy

Well-Known Member
Wouldn't wasps have to agree to that, i can't see a cash strapped business agreeing to offset rent against a new pitch.
Better that than being litigated for the rest I think.
Would imagine it would placate the EFL, whether they have any pressure or sanctions somehow the the ACL arm and not the team.
 

samccov1987

Well-Known Member
Struggling to see what the club can do to remedy the situation. At the moment other than a few internet posts I’m not even sure what work is really going into the pitch.

Have we got the money to lay a pitch ourselves? Possibly but then surely as wasps would also benefit we’d want the money back. Then wasps don’t appear to have any and can’t afford for us to deduct from upcoming rent.

I thought they’d get the Wigan game on but now you have to worry about the rest of our August fixtures.

Can we see Andy Street coming to the rescue with a grant/loan for a new pitch. Would WMCA support this and do we think SISU really want the situation resolved?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top