Ideal semi-realistic rest of window (1 Viewer)

Forums New posts
Tea & Busquets

Tea & Busquets

Well-Known Member
In: Sibley, Bird, Plange (loan), Adaramola (loan), CB (loan), Rwb (loan)

Out: O’Hare, Waghorn (loan), Kane (?), Tavares (loan)

not sure what the stance on moore is but we will need a new keeper if what’s being said is true. 3 new loan defenders is a bit of a stretch, i can see only two being done depending on the situation.
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Why six loans?

Ideal:

Out: Hamer, O’Hare, Waghorn, Walker, Kane, Wilson
In: AM x 2, CM x 2, CB, GK perm, LWB, RWB ST loan

Realistic:

Out: O’Hare, Waghorn
In: AM, CM, CB perm, LWB loan
 
Telfer85

Telfer85

Well-Known Member
Out: hamer, kane and waghorn

In cm x2 perm ( 1 established 1 prospect) adaramola loan, rwb x1 perm (backup) plange loan
 
ccfc1234

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
Not sure I agree with the above that has the 'ideal window' with O'Hare departing? Grrat teams are built on solid foundations, team spirit and footballing understanding. The turnover some are suggesting could be great if nearly every signing was successful, but would represent somewhat of a gamble.
 
ccfc1234

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
Ideal

OUT: Waghorn, Walker, Kane. These 3 alone would free up a significant amount of wages.

IN: LWB, ACM/ST (ideally a player who can cover both roles). I would add RWB to the list but we have Eccles who looks like a decent option there and the new lad from spurs I think could progress faster than other u23 signings have.
 
torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
What's being said about Moore?
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
I don't think Waghorn will be going anywhere or Kane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AOM
Skybluedownunder

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
Ideal

OUT: Kane, Waghorn, Walker, Kelly

IN: Cyrus Christie, McCallum, Liam Delap, Callum Styles


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
slowpoke

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
If we can get Waggy and Walker out on loan even if we have to stump up half their wages it would still leave some serious wedge to bring in at least one decent player Sibley and/or Bird would do me
 
SlowerThanPlatt

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
slowpoke said:
If we can get Waggy and Walker out on loan even if we have to stump up half their wages it would still leave some serious wedge to bring in at least one decent player Sibley and/or Bird would do me
Click to expand...

How would saving 5k a week go towards paying a transfer fee for them two players?
 
junglej13

junglej13

Well-Known Member
Tea & Busquets said:
In: Sibley, Bird, Plange (loan), Adaramola (loan), CB (loan), Rwb (loan)

Out: O’Hare, Waghorn (loan), Kane (?), Tavares (loan)

not sure what the stance on moore is but we will need a new keeper if what’s being said is true. 3 new loan defenders is a bit of a stretch, i can see only two being done depending on the situation.
Click to expand...
Almost the same as this but not too bothered about another centre back. Would like Anjorin on loan instead and a new permanent right back if Kane is offloaded.
 
Skybluedownunder

Skybluedownunder

Well-Known Member
Skybluedownunder said:
Ideal

OUT: Kane, Waghorn, Walker, Kelly

IN: Cyrus Christie, McCallum, Liam Delap, Callum Styles


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Still think my choices are better to be honest and upgrading on every player out the door

If we sold O’Hare it would make it more affordable on the wage front. Could then bring in that Tino Anjorin

Don’t mind the idea of the Palace left back or Max Bird or Sibley, just think the above choice are better options.

Liam Delap on loan would be bloody delightful to swap with Godden or Gyokeres when they tire out and would be someone really pushing them for a starting lineup place, or replacing Godden when he’s injured for half a season Then means Tavares can move up to fourth striker. Would be good for Man City too having two of their players at one club when going to watch how they go

In what I proposed above you’d only need to buy one player which would be Callum Styles which will make up for Kelly being injured for half the year and then when the inevitable happens that we lose Hamer we are covered there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
SlowerThanPlatt

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
Skybluedownunder said:
Still think my choices are better to be honest and upgrading on every player out the door

If we sold O’Hare it would make it more affordable on the wage front. Could then bring in that Tino Anjorin

Don’t mind the idea of the Palace left back or Max Bird or Sibley, just think the above choice are better options.

Liam Delap on loan would be bloody delightful to swap with Godden or Gyokeres when they tire out and would be someone really pushing them for a starting lineup place, or replacing Godden when he’s injured for half a season Then means Tavares can move up to fourth striker. Would be good for Man City too having two of their players at one club when going to watch how they go

In what I proposed above you’d only need to buy one player which would be Callum Styles which will make up for Kelly being injured for half the year and then when the inevitable happens that we lose Hamer we are covered there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Southampton had a permanent move turned down for Delap. They want to loan him to a top Championship side with the obvious destination being Burnley
 
stevefloyd

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
Skybluedownunder said:
Still think my choices are better to be honest and upgrading on every player out the door

If we sold O’Hare it would make it more affordable on the wage front. Could then bring in that Tino Anjorin

Don’t mind the idea of the Palace left back or Max Bird or Sibley, just think the above choice are better options.

Liam Delap on loan would be bloody delightful to swap with Godden or Gyokeres when they tire out and would be someone really pushing them for a starting lineup place, or replacing Godden when he’s injured for half a season Then means Tavares can move up to fourth striker. Would be good for Man City too having two of their players at one club when going to watch how they go

In what I proposed above you’d only need to buy one player which would be Callum Styles which will make up for Kelly being injured for half the year and then when the inevitable happens that we lose Hamer we are covered there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Thats a bit optimistic Kelly only being out half the year
 
fernandopartridge

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Skybluedownunder said:
Still think my choices are better to be honest and upgrading on every player out the door

If we sold O’Hare it would make it more affordable on the wage front. Could then bring in that Tino Anjorin

Don’t mind the idea of the Palace left back or Max Bird or Sibley, just think the above choice are better options.

Liam Delap on loan would be bloody delightful to swap with Godden or Gyokeres when they tire out and would be someone really pushing them for a starting lineup place, or replacing Godden when he’s injured for half a season Then means Tavares can move up to fourth striker. Would be good for Man City too having two of their players at one club when going to watch how they go

In what I proposed above you’d only need to buy one player which would be Callum Styles which will make up for Kelly being injured for half the year and then when the inevitable happens that we lose Hamer we are covered there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Why on earth would you sell a high energy player like O'Hare to replace with his polar opposite who couldn't get a game for Huddersfield

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Gyokeres, Godden, Walker, Waghorn, Tavares.

If we were playing football manager I would really would like to see Walker and Waghorn moved on and another striker brought in. That list has one too many on for me before you get to preferences anyway.
 
ms639

ms639

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Why six loans?

Ideal:

Out: Hamer, O’Hare, Waghorn, Walker, Kane, Wilson
In: AM x 2, CM x 2, CB, GK perm, LWB, RWB ST loan

Realistic:

Out: O’Hare, Waghorn
In: AM, CM, CB perm, LWB loan
Click to expand...

In what way is this at all ideal?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top