Flatter to Deceive (1 Viewer)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Is Kelly also an underwhelming player who flatters to deceive then? Just trying to keep this thread on topic.

No as he’s not costing over 10 grand a week
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Why? They hardly threatened? We showed that we are easily competitive in every area but upfront.

James is like putting gold furry dice in a lada windscreen and ignoring the fact we have to win a road race with a knackered underperforming engine up front.

Get a new engine instead

Part of the reason they hardly threatened was James' positional sense was so good. Great anticipcation.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Part of the reason they hardly threatened was James' positional sense was so good. Great anticipcation.

Nonsense we were the dominant force and would have won with a real striker in the middle
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I don’t think he adds any more than Kelly and it’s a pointless signing given the mess we are in

Maybe not but the point is KELLY'S OUT INJURED AND CAN'T PLAY. We needed a similar, experienced head in there to replace him and he's done that. If/when Kelly returns maybe they'd be great together at the base of the box and give O'Hare and Hamer more freedom. Maybe they'll be too similar and be treading on each others boots. But I hope we get the chance to try it out.
 

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
I don’t think he adds any more than Kelly and it’s a pointless signing given the mess we are in

A lot of truth in that statement. A fit Kelly would surely start ahead of James and in response to an earlier hypothetical question, I would definitely prefer a Charlie Austin over a Matty James.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
But it’s ok to have a lumbering clueless buffoon at number 9 rather than trying to find a half decent alternative

Like the international Gyokeres? They were also confident Walker would be back soon and at the time it was hoped Godden's injury would only be short term.
 

superskyblue

Well-Known Member
But it’s ok to have a lumbering clueless buffoon at number 9 rather than trying to find a half decent alternative
This thread isn't about Max. It's about how James flatters to deceive in your opinion. Something which we are all enjoying you being proven drastically wrong about.

It's ok to admit you were wrong from time to time. We all make mistakes or errors of judgement. You'd be a lot more credible if you admitted you were wrong from time to time.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Maybe not but the point is KELLY'S OUT INJURED AND CAN'T PLAY. We needed a similar, experienced head in there to replace him and he's done that. If/when Kelly returns maybe they'd be great together at the base of the box and give O'Hare and Hamer more freedom. Maybe they'll be too similar and be treading on each others boots. But I hope we get the chance to try it out.

Kelly has also only featured in 11 games and again it’a using limited resources to create improvement in results - let’s see if they improve
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Your point was that he was an underwhelming player who flatters to deceive. Clearly neither is true, but your attempts to pivot to a different argument are fun all the same.

I was going to use the title Vigil In A Wildeness of Mirrors but that might have looked a tad pretentious
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Kelly has also only featured in 11 games and again it’a using limited resources to create improvement in results - let’s see if they improve

Murray
Green
Austin
Cosgrove

Would you have signed any of these and tried to outbid the clubs who went for them?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Kelly has also only featured in 11 games and again it’a using limited resources to create improvement in results - let’s see if they improve

So if Kelly's only featured in 11 games due to injury then we needed to get someone in to cover for him then didn't we?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Murray
Green
Austin
Cosgrove

Would you have signed any of these and tried to outbid the clubs who went for them?

Or would you have tried to sign the latest Ollie Watkins for a couple of million?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
So if Kelly's only featured in 11 games due to injury then we needed to get someone in to cover for him then didn't we?

well no as we’ve played most games without him
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
The real point of this thread is not to criticise James. Grendel is actually having a go a Robins without mentioning his name.

Grendel is still smarting over his "Taxi for Robins" thread which nosedived because Robins got us promoted as Champions.

Grendel is desperate for Robins to fail.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
We don't have a couple of million to do that

Well yes we do if we didn’t sign James and we decided to actually use loans from the owners to sign him

also it’s not £2 million up front and if we stayed up he’d pay for himself
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You wanted us to ask for several million to bring in an unproven player-this conversation is done.

So if we’d signed Ollie Watkins Mk 2 you’d be moaning we should not bother and stick with biamou

Fine that’s your view - I think differently
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Well yes we do if we didn’t sign James and we decided to actually use loans from the owners to sign him

also it’s not £2 million up front and if we stayed up he’d pay for himself

Come on, you’re really not as thick as you’re demonstrating here.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Come on, you’re really not as thick as you’re demonstrating here.

Sorry? Do you think Oliver Norwood was a good addition when he signed for us?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
I was going to use the title Vigil In A Wildeness of Mirrors but that might have looked a tad pretentious

Most of your posts are pretentious dear.
 

baldy

Well-Known Member
I don’t think he adds any more than Kelly and it’s a pointless signing given the mess we are in

Thick comment seeing as we needed someone in the Kelly mould to replace Kelly....think about what you're saying
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
He was, as it goes. Don’t see how that is relevant to this nonsense idea that if we hadn’t signed James we’d be able to spend £2m on a striker.

Because we still got relegated as we had Clive platt upfront...
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Thick comment seeing as we needed someone in the Kelly mould to replace Kelly....think about what you're saying

Again Kelly has played 11 games - do you need to replace Kelly as a priority or biamou
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top