Beckham Left Out of Olympic Squad (4 Viewers)

Nick

Administrator
I was looking forward to him and Giggs.

I wonder who will be picked.

Anybody know when they announce the teams?
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
Picked Richards as he wanted extra defensive cover supposedly.

Would have loved to see Beckham there personally but Pearce hasn't bowed to public pressure and will pick a squad he thinks will win it so fair play to him.
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
A huge disgrace and affront to the man. After his achievements for his country in helping to secure the games, lending his name and celebrity to everything in aiding that bid and subsequent promotion (done for free and willingly) how can anyone not put him in the starting 11 in what is afterall merely a side show event and not taken that seriously?

Once again the FA have overseen another complete cock-up. Having Beckham there would ensure worlwide attention to the tornement in particular from the United States, proably the largest audience viewing and so here we see sponsorship money and support being lost by inepitude and frankly how the Olympic organsiers (Coe and all) plus the FA could allow that to happen is beyond me.
It's a commercial event and you need all the commercial promoting hype at your disposal....beckham no matter what you think personally is exactly that. Yes it helps his own coffers too but that's hardly the point.

This decision was far above Stuart Pearce's pay grade and that should have been seen and sorted before this embarassment.
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
As John Barnes (I think) said if you're basing it on the above then Seb Coe should be running the 800 metres.

If you put Stuart Pearce in charge then you have to expect him to take it serious and want to win. Fair play to him if he thinks Beckham doesn't fit into his side and he needs other players in his squad then that is up to him. Just because you perceive it not to be taken seriously doesn't mean that him and his squad agree.
 

smouch1975

Well-Known Member
A huge disgrace and affront to the man. After his achievements for his country in helping to secure the games, lending his name and celebrity to everything in aiding that bid and subsequent promotion (done for free and willingly) how can anyone not put him in the starting 11 in what is afterall merely a side show event and not taken that seriously?

Once again the FA have overseen another complete cock-up. Having Beckham there would ensure worlwide attention to the tornement in particular from the United States, proably the largest audience viewing and so here we see sponsorship money and support being lost by inepitude and frankly how the Olympic organsiers (Coe and all) plus the FA could allow that to happen is beyond me.
It's a commercial event and you need all the commercial promoting hype at your disposal....beckham no matter what you think personally is exactly that. Yes it helps his own coffers too but that's hardly the point.

This decision was far above Stuart Pearce's pay grade and that should have been seen and sorted before this embarassment.

Tis the English way, stiff upper lip what, what
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
I doubt anyone (bar Pearce) in the country could care if we won the tournament or not (we won't btw). Therefore for the nostalgia, for the hype, as a thank you for efforts, for the bums on seats and for the tournament as a whole he should have been included.

If it were purely on current ability he would be nowhere near the squad, but then on ability alone I imagine the effort to make it not just a virtuaally all England squad have meant sacrafices. As for Richards, if Pearce belives he is one of the top 3 available overage players in the country then his judgement is severely impaired.

Its a smack in the face for Becks and he deserved better imo.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I find all this a bit bizarre. Is the Olympics a charity now? Perhaps Lord Coe can do the 1500 metres, Virginia wade can be in the tennis squad and I guess pele can play for brazil in the next tournament.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I doubt anyone (bar Pearce) in the country could care if we won the tournament or not (we won't btw). Therefore for the nostalgia, for the hype, as a thank you for efforts, for the bums on seats and for the tournament as a whole he should have been included.

If it were purely on current ability he would be nowhere near the squad, but then on ability alone I imagine the effort to make it not just a virtuaally all England squad have meant sacrafices. As for Richards, if Pearce belives he is one of the top 3 available overage players in the country then his judgement is severely impaired.

Its a smack in the face for Becks and he deserved better imo.

The world does not revolve around David Beckham surprisingly enough. None of the England squad that went to the Euros was eligible for selection which rules out a fair number of other defenders you could call better. Other strong nations take the tournament seriously and this idea we should just write it off to give Becks a hurrah is absurd.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Nobody is suggesting it does, but since he is a role model, who is from the area and put a great amount of time and effort in securing the games for an event in which we won't participate in again as a one off special invitation then he deserved a place. This is about a bit more than just football ... imo of course which hopefully I'm allowed without it being interpreted any other way to fit an argument
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Nobody is suggesting it does, but since he is a role model, who is from the area and put a great amount of time and effort in securing the games for an event in which we won't participate in again as a one off special invitation then he deserved a place. This is about a bit more than just football ... imo of course which hopefully I'm allowed without it being interpreted any other way to fit an argument

But by the same token Lord Coe put a lot more effort it so why shouldn't he have a run around the track. Really his effectiveness has long passed. He should have made life easy and said no to being considered but this has never been his style. I never see him do anything unless it is for maximum publicity to himself and personally I'm glad the correct sporting decision was made.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
If he wants a token role then I'm sure one can be found (indeed I'm pretty sure Seb Coe is trying to find just that). I just think that when people slag off the likes of Stuart Pearce who wore his heart on his sleeve for England himself, they're taking it a bit too far.
 

Tad

Member
Dunno why we're not taking this more serious. Could see us win something on a international level.
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
I doubt anyone (bar Pearce) in the country could care if we won the tournament or not (we won't btw). Therefore for the nostalgia, for the hype, as a thank you for efforts, for the bums on seats and for the tournament as a whole he should have been included.

If it were purely on current ability he would be nowhere near the squad, but then on ability alone I imagine the effort to make it not just a virtuaally all England squad have meant sacrafices. As for Richards, if Pearce belives he is one of the top 3 available overage players in the country then his judgement is severely impaired.

Its a smack in the face for Becks and he deserved better imo.
You honestly believe that no-one cares whether we win it or not?

I want every British athlete to win a gold medal in everything they compete in. But hey that's just me.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
i for one would love us to do well in this, firstly nice to see us play as britain and would be great to get a medal! Looking forward to it!
 

classicfooty

New Member
As John Barnes (I think) said if you're basing it on the above then Seb Coe should be running the 800 metres.

If you put Stuart Pearce in charge then you have to expect him to take it serious and want to win. Fair play to him if he thinks Beckham doesn't fit into his side and he needs other players in his squad then that is up to him. Just because you perceive it not to be taken seriously doesn't mean that him and his squad agree.

seb coe hasnt competed for years Becks is still a great footballer there is no comparison whatsoever, we aint gonna win it and there wont be a team GB footy team ever again so to leave him out it just ludicrous
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
seb coe hasnt competed for years Becks is still a great footballer there is no comparison whatsoever, we aint gonna win it and there wont be a team GB footy team ever again so to leave him out it just ludicrous

He is not still a great footballer.
 

ccfc2011

New Member
We would not have a olympics if it wasn't for Beckham shocking way to treat one of our greatest players.
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
seb coe hasnt competed for years Becks is still a great footballer there is no comparison whatsoever, we aint gonna win it and there wont be a team GB footy team ever again so to leave him out it just ludicrous

You seem to be missing the whole point that Beckham should only get picked on merit and not what he does outside of football.

Pearce didn't think he was what was needed for his squad so left him out. Simple.
 

Macca

Well-Known Member
Oh dear poor old David , he ll get over it. For once his " image" hasn t got him his own way. He did well enough out of it through his career. Would have been interesting how far he would have got if he was an ugly c**t
 

Tad

Member
Appointing Pearce shows we're not taking this seriously like we should. Possible the only chance we could win something internationally for a while.
 
Last edited:

classicfooty

New Member
i personally couldnt give a shit if we won it or not in my opinion this should be about rewarding those who have had great careers ie beckham, giggs and maybe scholesy
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
i personally couldnt give a shit if we won it or not in my opinion this should be about rewarding those who have had great careers ie beckham, giggs and maybe scholesy

You're honestly being serious as well aren't you?

You think a Great Britain Olympic side is the best vehicle to honour careers of footballers still plying their trade for their respective teams?

Probably the stupidest post I have ever read on here.
 

Real

New Member
Correct decision. Beckham is well past his best and who cares about the work he put in to help us win the Olympics, the participants should be picked on merit and nothing else. I can't believe people are questioning Pearce because he hasn't chosen Beckham? Some people need to realise there is more to the Olympics and life than being a celebrity. Becks was a good player once, but he isn't anymore, so grow up and let a FOOTBALL manager make a FOOTBALL decision, rather than choose a side based on vacuous celebrity.


---
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?se5q5a
 

classicfooty

New Member
You're honestly being serious as well aren't you?

You think a Great Britain Olympic side is the best vehicle to honour careers of footballers still plying their trade for their respective teams?

Probably the stupidest post I have ever read on here.

not so sure about that mate most of your posts iv read have been pretty stupid
:jerkit:
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
100% the right decision, based on what I saw on TV of Beckham playing for LA Galaxy last week. He was really poor against poor opposition. Kept losing possession. If that was the same game Pearce went to see him in then it was easy to see why he was left out.
 

classicfooty

New Member
why has giggs been chosen? why has bellamy been chosen after a few poor games last season and why has Micah richards been chosen when he wouldnt go on standby for England?
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
iliterate? i think you are suffering from Beckham envy mate, its quite common amongst fat middle aged men who could never kick a football

For fucks sake at least spell illiterate right you pleb.

Not at all, I loved Beckham in his heyday, great player and a great England Captain who loved playing for his country.

However, I don't think he should be "rewarded" a place in the olympics. He should be there on merit. Very much like you and the special olympics.

I ain't middle aged and I kick a football every week. However, I will give you fat. Not fat enough however that I wouldn't use your head as a football though soppy bollocks.
 

classicfooty

New Member
For fucks sake at least spell illiterate right you pleb.

Not at all, I loved Beckham in his heyday, great player and a great England Captain who loved playing for his country.

However, I don't think he should be "rewarded" a place in the olympics. He should be there on merit. Very much like you and the special olympics.

I ain't middle aged and I kick a football every week. However, I will give you fat. Not fat enough however that I wouldn't use your head as a football though soppy bollocks.

whatever you fanny stop crying like a little bitch cos someone has a different opinion to yours :sleep:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top