But what you provided shows only 4 out of 10 professions with a majority of PRIVATELY EDUCATED (not Eton specifically)
All that could suggest is that private education employs the better teachers, who turn out better educated & better equipped people to fill the jobs in most of those fields. Others maybe feel bitter they have missed out somewhere & therefore adopt anti-Tory (because of the perception that only Tories are turned out from such places)
I mean, your original comment regarding the armed forces...the consideration that the average squaddie or similar in the navy or air force is automatically a Tory is laughable in itself.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
So much to unpack. I only mentioned Eton specifically in terms of the politics of those that come out of it. Eton is the worst example but all private schools are on that scale.
Squaddies don’t run the army. That’s like me complaining about tech giants and you saying the bloke who works in the Amazon fulfilment center is alright. But there is a right wing bias in the military, just as there’s a left wing bias in academia, because those careers suit those philosophical beliefs. Also, you don’t see other professions needing to post up guidelines on how to spot far right sentiment among their ranks.
As for the quality of teaching argument, that makes no sense as private schools take from the same pool. I’d like to see some evidence. Regardless you’re now arguing about *why* something is the case not *if* it’s the case which was your original point.
If you want my professional opinion as a former teacher the attainment gap between public and private is no great mystery. They have a self selecting cohort of better off pupils, they have far more funding and smaller class sizes. But mostly they have better networking opportunities. I work with privately educated people and see this every day.