shmmeee
Well-Known Member
They can be loans though.
Hamer (20 Viewers)
- Thread starter Covcraig@bury
- Start date
They can be loans though.
Evo1883
Well-Known Member
Be better for us if they weren't, but I agree
TomRad85
Well-Known Member
I'd trust us to replace him pretty well with 5 million. Even if the replacement was only half as good initially it would be fine with the improvements we've made elsewhere.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Yeah 5 you take it
I think I'm more along lines of 2.5m is maybe just not worth it even though it's a lot of money to us.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
I just think we’re better off going for someone with a year of growth in them than trying to find the finished article next season. We have three decent strikers, with O’Hare to come back and maybe take a spot too. And we have Binks and Latibeaudiere as well as Bidwell if we need it. We currently have no reserve for Hamer.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
The latter yes, but I thought the whole reason we declined McNally was in wanting more permanent players.
TomRad85
Well-Known Member
I think the management may agree with you. I'm sure they have a number in mind they deem acceptable for what is a years service.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Needs must though. If it’s a choice between Kitching or Humphries and a long term Hamer successor I’d take the latter.
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
At least you're more realistic with value!
Danceswithhorses
Well-Known Member
If Hamer wants to move (in this window) because of ambition, i can understand that and have no problem with it.
Moving to another championship side though would be odd and frankly unacceptable, given how much ccfc have spent this window...i mean how much more ambitious does he want us to be...we must be one of the top spenders in the championship.
Moving to another championship side though would be odd and frankly unacceptable, given how much ccfc have spent this window...i mean how much more ambitious does he want us to be...we must be one of the top spenders in the championship.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
If that were the choice I’d agree. Hopefully it isn’t
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Two and a half probably depends who to. If he does genuinely want to go back to NL you let him go with a fat sell on clause in case there's a time he's no longer homesick.
Yeah I’m surprised not to see a youngster in who we can start developing as a replacement.
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
He would only go to Leeds if money was his main motivator.
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Why would such a player want to be backup for a season?
Covcraig@bury
Well-Known Member
If we sell him to an English club we need to put a clause in saying he can’t play against us.
Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Impossible
Covcraig@bury
Well-Known Member
Why ?
Balli001
Well-Known Member
I think that can only be put in to loan contracts
Top teams are also adding a buy back clause in addition to the sell on clause. That would protect us from the Dutch club selling back to an English club.
Because they’d be young and still developing?
San Francisco
Well-Known Member
This is what I think too. If we get promoted then he'll probs sign a new contract and if we don't then he'll go to Holland. Think next summer we'll sign his replacement, someone who won't be too far off Gus ability and is younger so can improve further.
SleepyGinger
Well-Known Member
Because it’s a sideways move when you take the money out of it. They could probably pay 10k a week more? Think he’d rather stay here for a year then sign for a prem/European team. Think we’d want more from a team considered a rival too, probably more than Leeds would pay.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Just watched a video of his pass to yok away at Luton last season stunning
NorthernWisdom
Well-Known Member
Not if he wants to return to NL for personal reasons he won't
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Nah he won't go national league. Too good for that
Legia Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
My impression is that him wanting to go back to Holland has been completely blown up on here, with the theory seemingly growing a life of its own as more and more posters give it credence by adding 2+2 in relation to his marriage break up and a newspaper article from a year ago saying he would like to return to Feyenoord before he retires.
Hopefully he plays a starring role on Sunday which gives him the encouragement to stay with us and sign a new contract. However, bearing in mind Everton want £1m for Tom Cannon to leave them on a seasons loan, the club need to work out a point at which a potential transfer fee for Hamer is lower than the value to the team of retaining his services for the coming season. If we only get low ball offers of say £3m then the club have a big call to make.
Samo
Well-Known Member
He could easily be the difference between promotion or not, that's a snip at 3m
Saddlebrains
Well-Known Member
We wont entertain anything less than 10. Robins and Doug have made that clear to Gus.
Robins would rather lose him for nothing and have him knitting this team together for a proper go at promotion.
Also, from what im told he feels he can make a big sale next summer from elsewhere within the side, so its not crucial that its Gus that has to go. If that makes sense?
Robins would rather lose him for nothing and have him knitting this team together for a proper go at promotion.
Also, from what im told he feels he can make a big sale next summer from elsewhere within the side, so its not crucial that its Gus that has to go. If that makes sense?
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Sheaf is one of those
Saddlebrains
Well-Known Member
As is O'Hare as long as he comes back how he was. And theres no doubt he will sign a year extension
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Could be a buy and loan back/out a la Maddison/McCallum
