Goal or no goal (1 Viewer)

[robbiekeane]

Well

 

---

[Nick]

 

[pusbccfc]

The view behind the goal makes the decision look even worse.

 

[Dickie]

Clear as day. A goal.

 

[SBT]

We have goal-line technology right? If so, this is a pointless debate.

 

[skyblue1991]

Definite goal

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

 

[Ccfcisparks]

Real time I said a goal but would like to see it from another angle to decide

 

[hill83]

The ball is in the air there which is why you can see clear daylight underneath it but still not entirely over the line.

 

[SkyblueTexan]

If Hull had scored, it would have counted as a goal before it crossed the line.

 

[shepardo01]

We have goal-line technology right? If so, this is a pointless debate.

Could the other white line have interferred as the ball is right on that...???

 

[shepardo01]

WellView attachment 24171

Could the other white line have interfered with the tech???

 

[clint van damme]

The ball is in the air there which is why you can see clear daylight underneath it but still not entirely over the line.

At you John McEnroe

 

[Liquid Gold]

No goal.

I can see why people want it to be because the vast majority of the ball is over the line and there are MMs in it but from that angle there is nothing to suggest it definitively crossed the line at any point and the technology backs it up.

Sky blue tinted glasses to say it was a goal.

 

[David O'Day]

We have goal-line technology right? If so, this is a pointless debate.

The villa Sheffield United game shows hawkeye can be horribly wrong

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

 

[theferret]

No goal.

I can see why people want it to be because the vast majority of the ball is over the line and there are MMs in it but from that angle there is nothing to suggest it definitively crossed the line at any point and the technology backs it up.

Sky blue tinted glasses to say it was a goal.

Really can't see what you're seeing. I agree the ball is in the air on the still image but if you rock the video back and forward it is clearly over.

 

[SeaSeeEffCee]

The villa Sheffield United game shows hawkeye can be horribly wrong

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

That’s basically the only time ever that it’s failed and that was because there was a million players on the line blocking all the sensors.

 

[Terry_dactyl]

It looked like it went over the line twice!!

 

[Liquid Gold]

Really can't see what you're seeing. I agree the ball is in the air on the still image but if you rock the video back and forward it is clearly over.

Don't agree at all.

Also this poll is currently 5-9 in favour. It's in favour but it shows it can't be that obvious an error.

 

[SBT]

The villa Sheffield United game shows hawkeye can be horribly wrong

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

It’s incredibly accurate and to suggest otherwise based on one high-profile error among thousands of games is silly.

 

[skyblue1991]

No goal.

I can see why people want it to be because the vast majority of the ball is over the line and there are MMs in it but from that angle there is nothing to suggest it definitively crossed the line at any point and the technology backs it up.

Sky blue tinted glasses to say it was a goal.

Theres not want about it, we were shit and deserved nothing from the game

It was close but it's crossed the line

 

[slowpoke]

Without doubt referee and linesman between should of seen that.

 

[Sick Boy]

Not seen a replay but in real time behind the goal it didn’t look like one to me.

 

[SBT]

Honestly find it bizarre that we’re focusing so much on a goal-line decision that will likely be explained away by technology in an instant, while the blatant foul on Tavares in the area seems to be a far more egregious example of a shit reffing decision.

 

[jim20]

100% over the line. With the poor penalty calls we should’ve at least got a draw….maybe not deserved but how many games have we deserved to win this season and not

 

[rexo87]

It's not over. The whole ball has to be completely over and not just the but touching the ball. The top of the ball is over the top of the line

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

 

[SeaSeeEffCee]

I don’t understand why they haven’t shown the graphic they usually show when there is a close goal line decision.

 

[Hertsccfc]

Initially thought it was a goal but seeing it back i don't think it was and it is unlikely the technology wasn't working.

 

[clint van damme]

WellView attachment 24171

Anyone who looks at this and thinks its not over the line needs their mind rewiring.

 

[SeaSeeEffCee]

Anyone who looks at this and thinks its not over the line needs their mind rewiring.

It is impossible to judge from a still image from a low quality stream while the ball is in the air.

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

I think Tisdale said they will get an image from Hawkeye in the next twenty four hours. Knowing that ref he probably had forgotten to put batteries on his watch he certainly did on the one he was timing the game on.

 

[skybluesam66]

100% a goal - watch this , was in for around 2 seconds

 

[CCFC54321]

I was behind the goal and it was clearly over the line. The Hull player and keeper knew it was over as well.

 

[ajsccfc]

Looked it from where I was and the footage but without a view from dead on the line I'm not certain. On CWR they kept talking about goal line technology, how long have we had that? Didn't hear about it

 

[baldy]

WellView attachment 24171

Blimey - Ians shot even destroyed half of that players body judging by that still

 

[skybluesam66]

also the ball is on the ground,