I recently had a conversation with SL through twitter on the way he had questioned Micheal from the SBT. I accused him of being aggresive towards the caller and he argued that he had questioned him with vigour. I said he does not question Fisher, board members or Sisu in that manner but he said he does, thats his opinion. He intimated that he will question any one in the same way in the future as that is his job, he also refuted my concerns that he was afraid of upsetting the apple cart and would question the board of the club in exactly the same manner as I had accused him not being exactly impartial. He did say though that he hopes people do not think he is being rude and he does not wish to upset callers, but their are minorities amongst the city faithfull that will always misinterpret things that are said or printed in the media to further their own ends and will not be shifted from that perspective. These are his answers and you can make of them what you will, I do believe their is stuff that he hears that cant be repeated because of the legal implications that would then ensue, I also believe that their are people out their that will misinterpret things and only look from their perspective. His problem is and always will be the fact that SISU and the club remain silent about their intentions so he can not get an interview to offer a balanced view to judge him by, he also needs to come out once and for all and either deny or acknowledge his involvement with the club and this will put to rest any accusations of impartiality. Love him or loath him that is also your choice i am not here to defend him, i do believe however you can only make the correct judgement after or when he has Fisher or SISU in front of him and see how he interviews them and to see their answers.