Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Sorry have to answer this one,no you wouldn't cos I'd have slapped the both of you
Why should that matter If they want to go?
I hate the Villa but would have took him if he had asked.
He was forced to be a City fan by me shame he won't go any more hasn't been to one match in the last 2 seasons.
Used to take 4 off them to every game now none of them are interested.
Or there are just lots of city fans who are men so when their missus is pregnant it is pretty much a given the kid will be a city fan... Apart from that bloke who is now a leicester fan to spite sisu, and because they went into the PL.
No, it's Ricoh or nothing for me. It's our home.
The Ricoh has never ever been our home, just been tenants.
Thats a stupid thing to say even by your standards
The Ricoh has never ever been our home, just been tenants.
Not stupid, FACT.
You own your own home, if you don't rent it!
Not worth wasting any more words.
One inch over the border and it's an big fat no from me. It's no different to the FA knocking down Wembley and building it in Gretna Green.
Stick to night fishing insteadFuck it might go myself always wanted to be a bandwagoner.
I have been offered a ticket but up to now have refused, be nice to see the Ricoh full and I enjoy a good game of Rugby.
Will have to see how I feel in the morning.
Move us 75 miles I guess.I'd probably go to begin with, wouldn't be the same though and not sure how long I would last.
To all those who say definitely no, what action do you propose the club take? Try and build in Coventry? If they try and it can't be done, then what? Sign up to a long term rent deal which condemns us to being a L1 club with maybe the odd season in the championship?
Exactly, it is down to common sense surely when it comes to location. Boundaries can move, so the one inch here or there thing surely doesn't mean that much?The council may not grant us planning permission in Coventry.
If the ground is easy to get to and is near enough ill go. Boundaries are just lines on a map.
Boundaries change. If the boundary changed so that the ricoh was part of Nuneaton council would you stop going? Would you fuck.
Common sense says it is a lot different though doesn't it?
I'd probably go to begin with, wouldn't be the same though and not sure how long I would last.
To all those who say definitely no, what action do you propose the club take? Try and build in Coventry? If they try and it can't be done, then what? Sign up to a long term rent deal which condemns us to being a L1 club with maybe the odd season in the championship?
So by using common sense you can see bermuda is about three miles from the ricoh, whereas gretna is how far from wembley?How? One isn't in England and one isn't in Coventry. Both are an inch the wrong side of their respected borders.
Deal with on what? Surely its wasps now?SISU sell it to someone that Coventry CC would be willing to deal with?
Deal with on what? Surely its wasps now?
No that own the ricoh which is why I wasn't sure what they were doing with.What, that own CCFC? I meant SISU sell CCFC to someone that CCC will deal with.
So by using common sense you can see bermuda is about three miles from the ricoh, whereas gretna is how far from wembley?
SISU sell it to someone that Coventry CC would be willing to deal with?
No that own the ricoh which is why I wasn't sure what they were doing with.
Surely the council can't stop a stadium being built just because it is sisu can they??I meant what could the club do.
Ok that is a possibility, either selling to a new owner who can build within Coventry or selling to Wasps owners an becoming joint partners, it's a better option than building outside city or signing up to a long term rent. How can we achieve that? SISU are seemingly happy to sit back and lose money whilst going ahead with whatever scheme they have in mind.
Why is a long term rental deal with Wasps our best option?I think it is purely a negotiating threat.
However if true it must be the only way SISU must believe they can exit with the least damage.
For the next person to purchase from SISU it will be about land and CCFC will be gone IMO.
The only option or the 'best' thing for CCFC would be to negotiate a long term rental deal with wasps. Yet those who say they are only interested in what's best for CCFC are not pushing for this?
Surely they can't refuse a new stadium just because it is sisu though can they? Surely if people think that then it's all the more reason to support a ground slightly outside?He means sell to owners who CCC would work with in regards to a new stadium within the city.
And why wasn't it an option for wasps?Why is a long term rental deal with Wasps our best option?
I meant what could the club do.
Ok that is a possibility, either selling to a new owner who can build within Coventry or selling to Wasps owners an becoming joint partners, it's a better option than building outside city or signing up to a long term rent. How can we achieve that? SISU are seemingly happy to sit back and lose money whilst going ahead with whatever scheme they have in mind.
Not stupid, FACT.
You own your own home, if you don't rent it!
Not worth wasting any more words.
Well I doubt they can say that, but they would be putting up every obstacle and using all the power they are allowed to ensure it doesn't happen. I remember last time it was brought up someone mentioned that if the club really wanted to build in Coventry they wouldn't be able to stop it and it would go to a public enquiry.Surely they can't refuse a new stadium just because it is sisu though can they? Surely if people think that then it's all the more reason to support a ground slightly outside?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?