Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Woodlands (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 5849
  • Start date Apr 2, 2019
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • …
  • 19
Next
First Prev 13 of 19 Next Last

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #421
Nick said:
Good to see the Telegraph reports have their fingers on the pulse.


Clearly no idea about the hotel stuff the Telegraph also reported on - - Plans for new 150-bedroom hotel at Ricoh Arena
Click to expand...

Another simple young reporter lent on to be absolutely non-critical of the council, pathetic.
 
Reactions: vow

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #422
luwalla said:
was it pre-planning advice the club were submitting and enquiry for though ? or was it an enquiry about the land , its availability & cost... we just dont know do we.

Id say the council have the opportunity to put the pressure back on the club here , and declare that they are open to discussion for the purchase of the site and are willing to engage it public discussions about the possibility of planning for a stadium.
Click to expand...

No I dont know for sure either I was just making sure that the correct information was out there in relation to part of the process, not expressing an opinion

It was however SISU who said that they had " provided to the Council four separate masterplans for the site." To me that indicates more than an enquiry about availability, but i appreciate others might see it differently
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #423
Nick said:
Yeah, as the council also own the land there's the other aspect other than just planning too.

It said in the last open statement last week.



Looks like he has done that again.



Will be interesting to see the next statement...
Click to expand...
Might be better to get any city fans/people in the Longford Ward not to vote for Mr Duggins then see how he likes it when livelihoods are under threat
 
Reactions: vow
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #424
Warwickhunt said:
Might be better to get any city fans/people in the Longford Ward not to vote for Mr Duggins then see how he likes it when livelihoods are under threat
Click to expand...

They have lost my vote for good, same as the Tory councillors who agree with it. Small time Charlies overstepping the mark all of them
 
Reactions: vow
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #425
chiefdave said:
Which of course is exactly what the council have done for Wasps with regard to building a hotel on car park c.

Don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect similar treatment for the football club.
Click to expand...

Don’t think Duggins can name a single player never mind a reason to give the club land
 

SkyBlueCharlie9

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #426
Council are s*****g themselves in my view as this is horrendous PR for them and can hear them squirming. Ball is currently in their court! Any support for the principle of Woodlands from CCC will take several weeks if Leaders are genuinely open minded and consult with stakeholders (e.g. Highways).
I think they will dismiss it out of hand though sadly.
If they did say OK lets look at Woodlands site, the acid test would be down to SISU as the consultant fees for putting together a detailed planning application would cost a minimum of £300K for such a complex stadium proposal. It gets more and more tactical/dafter by the minute, and as many have said I wish all parties would take a deep breath, swallow their pride and talk about Ricoh
 
L

luwalla

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #427
oldskyblue58 said:
No I dont know for sure either I was just making sure that the correct information was out there in relation to part of the process, not expressing an opinion

It was however SISU who said that they had " provided to the Council four separate masterplans for the site." To me that indicates more than an enquiry about availability, but i appreciate others might see it differently
Click to expand...

fair point... im pretty sure there is more & mirrors form both sides here.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #428
Magwitch said:
What pisses me off as desperation kicks in reality disappears and I can’t believe sisu haven’t if they are serious haven’t done oodles of homework and I can’t believe have chosen this site, there’s just about every negative possible,
listed buildings,
Poor infrastructure
Poor public transport
Poor parking,

You cannot seriously compare Masseys and it’s traffic with a new stadium first there was a huge car park at the back of the plant and obvious there were two rush hours day and lorry traffic but that grew over time from before the war, starting when there were few cars. Eastern Green estate didn’t exist intil the 70s, I remember that being fields right through to Allesley.
I’m not anti a new stadium and I don’t care where it is so long as it’s inside Cov. All I want is a proposal that’s for real not just words. There’s been over a year to develop plans, designs, who is building it and timescale. I suspect the EFL will want that too.
In fairness to sisu they didn’t announce this themselves when they do I expect some meat in the bones.
Click to expand...


Agree that you cant compare now to even the 70s and 80s when Masseys and Wickmans were there. However, they've been building the 'eastern green' estate since the 50s. Most of the houses from hockley lane across Sutton Ave and up to the woodlands were built in the 50s and early 60s.
 
Reactions: pusbccfc

vow

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #429
Warwickhunt said:
Might be better to get any city fans/people in the Longford Ward not to vote for Mr Duggins then see how he likes it when livelihoods are under threat
Click to expand...
Local elections coming up v soon, we will not be voting for Labour or Tories.
Lost our votes over this (and also the 2nd referendum bollox proposal).
 
Reactions: Greggs and RegTheDonk

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #430
vow said:
Local elections coming up v soon, we will not be voting for Labour or Tories.
Lost our votes over this (and also the 2nd referendum bollox proposal).
Click to expand...
You could do with some of the politically savvy people on here running in an independent group.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #431
RegTheDonk said:
You could do with some of the politically savvy people on here running in an independent group.
Click to expand...
No point Labour will win there seats and the Tories will in the slightly posher seats. Most people in cov won't vote based on this

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #432
David O'Day said:
No point Labour will win there seats and the Tories will in the slightly posher seats. Most people in cov won't vote based on this

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
It’s sad really. Charlton managed to get elected in Greenwich to sort their ground out.
 
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #433
Report on cwr about meeting with ccc on this Woodlands plan. Number of things came out that there were things re that site that would need to happen. I didn’t catch all but one thing said was there are 10 building on the site that are Grade 2 listed and the site is still an education site and to remove that it needs to go to the Secretary of State and there’s something there that goes to English Heritage didn’t catch what. The guy interviewed thought the whole planning process could take 3 years before any building was started sounds a long job to me.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #434
Magwitch said:
Report on cwr about meeting with ccc on this Woodlands plan. Number of things came out that there were things re that site that would need to happen. I didn’t catch all but one thing said was there are 10 building on the site that are Grade 2 listed and the site is still an education site and to remove that it needs to go to the Secretary of State and there’s something there that goes to English Heritage didn’t catch what. The guy interviewed thought the whole planning process could take 3 years before any building was started sounds a long job to me.
Click to expand...
The council have repeatedly stated when talking to the telegraph its designated for education and sporting use. If they're suddenly claiming its education only that needs checking.

Several grade 2 listed buildings but it appears that listing is relatively easy to remove and there is room for a stadium with those buildings still standing so that won't be an insurmountable issue.

Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if it took 3 years to break ground on a project of this size. In fact I'd say that was optimistic. Should it get to that stage will be down to the EFL to put down progress markers the club need to hit.
 
Reactions: vow
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #435
It was mentioned the Grade 2 listing can be removed, but the education side of things and the Secretary of State involvmentc is very different. I see that as the biggest obstacle.
Surely sisu knew all this.
It was also said up to 3000 people a week use the various sporting facilities.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #436
Grendel said:
Yes I’m sure
Click to expand...
Are you for real it's a fucking nightmare the roundabouts are shit and none locals make it worse by not knowing how to go around them same at the Camley roundabout.
Drive up there regular and my daughter used it every day when she worked in Meriden.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #437
chiefdave said:
The council have repeatedly stated when talking to the telegraph its designated for education and sporting use. If they're suddenly claiming its education only that needs checking.

Several grade 2 listed buildings but it appears that listing is relatively easy to remove and there is room for a stadium with those buildings still standing so that won't be an insurmountable issue.

Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if it took 3 years to break ground on a project of this size. In fact I'd say that was optimistic. Should it get to that stage will be down to the EFL to put down progress markers the club need to hit.
Click to expand...
Exactly will we last 5 years at somewhere like Brum?
 
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #438
olderskyblue said:
I used to work there many moons ago. The staggered start and finish times helped, but it was always better to avoid broad lane as the queues used to be pretty bad, every day.
Click to expand...
That’s right I worked there and if you worked up the track far enough you could go home, the only blokes who stopped to the official time were the ones clocking their gang members home for overtime at 5
 
Reactions: olderskyblue

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #439
letsallsingtogether said:
Exactly will we last 5 years at somewhere like Brum?
Click to expand...
Surely if this proceeds then the requirements have been met for SISU to drop the legal action and we sign a short term deal to stay at the Ricoh until the new stadium is ready.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #440
letsallsingtogether said:
Are you for real it's a fucking nightmare the roundabouts are shit and none locals make it worse by not knowing how to go around them same at the Camley roundabout.
Drive up there regular and my daughter used it every day when she worked in Meriden.
Click to expand...
Magwitch said:
That’s right I worked there and if you worked up the track far enough you could go home, the only blokes who stopped to the official time were the ones clocking their gang members home for overtime at 5
Click to expand...
Screw putting in a full planning application with experts devising a transport plan. LAST and Magwitch have decided its not possible.
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue, hill83, eastwoodsdustman and 2 others

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #441
letsallsingtogether said:
Are you for real it's a fucking nightmare the roundabouts are shit and none locals make it worse by not knowing how to go around them same at the Camley roundabout.
Drive up there regular and my daughter used it every day when she worked in Meriden.
Click to expand...

That's that then. The expert has spoken. Though not so much on the SISU open letter thread...
 
Reactions: Liquid Gold and chiefdave
H

Harryshipman1998

Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #442
chiefdave said:
Surely if this proceeds then the requirements have been met for SISU to drop the legal action and we sign a short term deal to stay at the Ricoh until the new stadium is ready.
Click to expand...

You are right of course.

So if the council don't block SISU from following the normal protocols to try and buy this land for a stadium development.
Then SISU should drop the legal action and like you say try and get a 5 year deal whilst they build it.
Let's see how that pans out?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #443
Magwitch said:
but the education side of things and the Secretary of State involvmentc is very different. I see that as the biggest obstacle.
Click to expand...
Where are you getting this education restriction from? There's no mention of it in any documents relating to the site on the council website as far as I can see.

The council themselves have public stated the land could be put to other uses including housing.

In fact a strong argument could be made that a new CCFC stadium, at which SBiTC would be based, is in line with the council sporting objectives for the site.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #444
letsallsingtogether said:
Are you for real it's a fucking nightmare the roundabouts are shit and none locals make it worse by not knowing how to go around them same at the Camley roundabout.
Drive up there regular and my daughter used it every day when she worked in Meriden.
Click to expand...

You do realise there is a new road network developing to support the huge housing development which will create more traffic every day than an average Ccfc attendance 23 days a year don’t you?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #445
Harryshipman1998 said:
You are right of course.

So if the council don't block SISU from following the normal protocols to try and buy this land for a stadium development.
Then SISU should drop the legal action and like you say try and get a 5 year deal whilst they build it.
Let's see how that pans out?
Click to expand...
Personally I wouldn't just sit back and wait 5 years as I've said earlier in this thread. I would suggest the council put a time limited forward contract in place, exactly as they have done for Wasps, that requires SISU to submit and get approval for a planning application in a specific timeframe. I would then suggest the EFL puts down markers as to what progress is required by a particular dates.

If and when the council stop delaying things and allow this to proceed pretty quickly SISU have to start spending big chunks of cash. Are they really going to do that if they have no intention of building a stadium.

For me its a win - win situation. Either we get a new stadium or SISU have to admit they are full of shit and we draw a line under the pretence there will be a new stadium. And while we are going through that process we stay at the Ricoh rather than moving out of the city. Works whatever way you look at it.
 
Reactions: The Penguin, SkyBlueCharlie9, Harryshipman1998 and 3 others

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #446
CharlesMore said:
Cannot see for one minute the local residents accepting this "proposal"

More non intentional showboating i'm afraid!
Click to expand...

Welcome back Charles - so nice to see your pro ccfc posts back after all this time
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #447
SkyBlueCharlie9 said:
Planning permission has not been submitted - it would have had to have been advertised and we'd have all heard about that! Its standard for developers to have lengthy pre-application discussions on tricky sites before submitting detailed planning applications. Would be good to know if the site has been genuinely considered for stadium by both CCC and SISU.

As an ex-Woodlands pupil, I agree that the site is plenty big enough for a stadium, plus potentially schools and other supporting residential, retail/ commercial development and community facilities - would just need a thorough Masterplan from a creative experienced team.

My mum still lives very close and I grew up in Eastern Green so I think one of hurdles is traffic/parking infrastructure. That said its not insurmountable with P&R, buses and trains to Tile Hill. Arguably the biggest challenge is local politics - in a moderately wealthy Tory voting area where protecting property prices/NIMBYism will be rife. I expect Posters in windows and a Facebook Group - KEEP CCFC OUT OF EASTERN GREEN will surface any day now! :happy:

I wonder if CCFC/SISU have tactically thought this site would seriously annoy the biggest number of people who then virtually beg Wasps and the Council to get a deal for the club to stay at the Ricoh. Who knows in this sorry saga but I fear my dream of a pint in the Scirebourne/Unicorn and walk up to the match might never become a reality!
Click to expand...

Moderately weathly Tory population? Its definitely not a Tory population.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #448
Grendel said:
You do realise there is a new road network developing to support the huge housing development which will create more traffic every day than an average Ccfc attendance 23 days a year don’t you?
Click to expand...

Struggling to see how the 'new road network' would benefit the Woodlands site.
 

Attachments

  • Masterplan-eastern-greenJPG.jpg
    145.4 KB · Views: 38

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #449
letsallsingtogether said:
Exactly will we last 5 years at somewhere like Brum?
Click to expand...

Might not be required. If the council are willing to move the proposal forward to a point where you could start going through that process and work with Sisu they've said they'll drop the legals (assuming a medium term deal at Ricoh). If it's a bluff, the council need to call their bluff. The more time passed and the more I see of this, the more I realise the council haven't exactly acted in good faith.
 
Reactions: The Penguin and chiefdave
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #450
chiefdave said:
Where are you getting this education restriction from? There's no mention of it in any documents relating to the site on the council website as far as I can see.

The council themselves have public stated the land could be put to other uses including housing.

In fact a strong argument could be made that a new CCFC stadium, at which SBiTC would be based, is in line with the council sporting objectives for the site.
Click to expand...
From the bloke interviewed tonight on CWR just after 5 Andrew something, find out for your fucking self on listen again you might learn something I’m sure someone on here will.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #451
Magwitch said:
From the bloke interviewed tonight on CWR just after 5 Andrew something, find out for your fucking self on listen again you might learn something I’m sure someone on here will.
Click to expand...
Coming from the bloke who seems the most uneducated about ccfc on a ccfc forum.
 
M

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #452
Nick said:
Coming from the bloke who seems the most uneducated about ccfc on a ccfc forum.
Click to expand...
Listen to the interview geek
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #453
Magwitch said:
Listen to the interview geek
Click to expand...
I will when you pay that charity bet. You know the one about you going to all these games

Amazing you become an expert on threads like this.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #454
Magwitch said:
From the bloke interviewed tonight on CWR just after 5 Andrew something, find out for your fucking self on listen again you might learn something I’m sure someone on here will.
Click to expand...

It was also mentioned back in 2016 when Fisher first announced an interest in the site as a new base for the training ground and academy.
CCFC consider Woodlands school site as possible home for Academy
 
Reactions: paulcalf

covmark

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 3, 2019
  • #455
skybluetony176 said:
It was also mentioned back in 2016 when Fisher first announced an interest in the site as a new base for the training ground and academy.
CCFC consider Woodlands school site as possible home for Academy
Click to expand...
Oh look another that's all over this thread, but has avoided the open letter thread.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: SkyBlueZack, The Reverend Skyblue, Grendel and 3 others
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • …
  • 19
Next
First Prev 13 of 19 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?