Otis
Well-Known Member
I was doing a radio show, weeman. I literally only had seconds to look each time.
Usually, it's instantaneous.
I was checking every 5 mins, so it was really frustrating.
I was doing a radio show, weeman. I literally only had seconds to look each time.Is it really much of an issue to scroll a bit more mate?
Unless you've got finger issues, I don't see the problem.
I was doing a radio show, weeman. I literally only had seconds to look each time.
Usually, it's instantaneous.
I was checking every 5 mins, so it was really frustrating.
It's not, though, is it.it can be very laborious
You can, but I did want to keep an eye on the Arsenal score too and also on League One.You can filter to the championship
To you maybe. To me it was an inconvenience and a lot of the time I couldn't check the scores in time.It's not, though, is it.
It's the most minor of minor inconveniences, if you could even call it that.
I do find it funny that you are telling me it wasn't an inconvenience to me, when you don't even know me or know what the situation was.It's not, though, is it.
It's the most minor of minor inconveniences, if you could even call it that.
You've said what the situation was, and I know what we're talking about.I do find it funny that you are telling me it wasn't an inconvenience to me, when you don't even know me or know what the situation was.
Would appreciate it if you didn't decide what was inconvenient to me, thanks.
What a load of tosh.You've said what the situation was, and I know what we're talking about.
This might sound patronising here, for which I apologise, but the definition of the word 'laborious' is something that needs significant effort to accomplish. There's not a single situation, anywhere in the world, where this can be applied to scrolling down a web-page to see some specific football scores.
It's moaning for moaning's sake because something isn't geared for your very specific needs. Bit entitled, no?
Yeah. I could have done that with hindsight. But at the time I only had seconds free and usually I just find the scores in the football scores, which is quite a logical thought processYou can just look at championship scores if you want
If you say so. This isn't a subject worthy of a bun-fight, though.What a load of tosh.
For two hours last night, I literally had seconds each time to check the scores. Usually that is not a problem, but last night it was, because it was taking much longer than usual.
I was juggling lots of things all at the same time, so I literally had a few seconds to look on each occasion.
It was taking me more than just a few seconds.
If England men were playing, there wouldn't be the domestic games, because it would be the international break.
Nothing entitled about it and that's the first time anyone has ever accused me of entitlement.So some brownie points to you.
If you say so. This isn't a subject worthy of a bun-fight, though.
But it *is* a sense of entitlement if you are complaining that something doesn't tailor itself to your very niche requirements.
Indeed!I am not here to argue either. I am just saying, for me last night, it was very frustrating.
Let's move on and talk about stuffing Portsmouth.
That does make it sound more interesting that it probably was, doesn't it.
Niche requirements?
Yup.That does make it sound more interesting that it probably was, doesn't it.
Ooh i love a good sock! (Not the one i keep under my bed, either!)Yup.
That sounds like some sort of escort I am enquiring about, for the night.
Though my niche requirement there is that she can keep her socks on.
All the women’s football stories on the BBC site are accompanied by captions reading “Women’s Football” and pictures of women. Sorry to say, if you were “misled” by that I think it’s actually just a skill issue.
Which country do you live in?They’ve even used a picture of a man to get me to press on women’s football this time! Those pesky journalists tricking me for clicks again!
View attachment 42469
Maybe that's because there weren't any matches.Have to scroll down a bit to find women’s football, contrary to the nonsense on this thread!
shite trolling attemptThe quality of the football is poor and not very exciting. I have suggested that ladies matches should be only 70 minutes - but I keep getting shot down in flames!
I'm only trying to help.
The quality of the football is poor and not very exciting. I have suggested that ladies matches should be only 70 minutes - but I keep getting shot down in flames!
I'm only trying to help.
shite trolling attempt
I'd be happy if every game went straight to penalties from the off!The quality of the football is poor and not very exciting. I have suggested that ladies matches should be only 70 minutes - but I keep getting shot down in flames!
I'm only trying to help.
*led astray
In top tennis tournaments, the ladies always only play 3 sets whilst the men play 5.shite trolling attempt
It's like the SPL takes precidence over the championship ffs.It's a good point. Split it down to men's and women's football. You can still have the England women winning a game, as the top headline, but then the link takes you to the women's football page.
It is a bit daft having to scroll lots of women's football scores to get to anything lower than Premier League level info
Yeah never underestimate that.It's like the SPL takes precidence over the championship ffs.
Were your fingers cramping up?Exactly that
The Championship scores were quite a few finger scroll strokes down in order to find them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?