Has he stated he's being victimised because he's black yet?
Fucking hell, some kind of racist pyramid.Has he stated he's being victimised because he's black yet?
Already been dropped.he's an idiot. His manager is Jewish. Probably soon to be ex manager.
Already been dropped.
He claims black people can't be racist
yeah, but it's a racist trope. Why can't people grasp you can criticise a wanker for being a wanker without aiming a lazy racist stereotype at them based on their religion or ethnicity?
edit - on the other side of that, there's a lot of whataboutery going on on social media, yeah but Katie Hopkins said this and Tommy Robinson said that. Doesn't matter, Wiley was being a racist prick, what they did doesn't excuse it.
He added: “They still see us as slaves. Slavery hasn’t stopped it’s just dressed up in a million pound record deal and it’s dressed up in trainer deals, nice shoes and it’s dressed up as come over here ….
The bloke is now giving interviews and saying stuff like this:
Systemic oppression and Wiley - Voice Online
HE KNOWS he articulated himself poorly, he also knows that is no excuse for what...www.voice-online.co.uk
His manager is Jewish. I think reading between the lines they've had a fall out and he's decided every Jewish person is to blame.
He's a fucking cretin. Someone close to him needs to get hold of him and sort him out for his own sake if nothing else.
It would appear something along those lines but for someone who's entire career is based about words and lyrics he seems very very poor at choosing them.
The interview doesn't do him any favours at all and rather than row back he seems to still insinuate it's the fault of THE Jews not A Jew. He basically blames anyone Jewish he's worked with and then says thereis a Jewish community he hasn't worked with. That to me therefore says it's the fault of ALL Jews.
Plus if he thinks slavery includes perks like million pound record deals I suggest he educate himself on what slavery actually is! I've no doubt that the industry is full of exploiters who take advantage of impressionable people, but it's across the spectrum - white, black, men, women, gay, straight It's whether you can be exploited that bother them.
He also goes on about how kids get these deals and when they're no longer popular don't have a house or anything but the producers etc do, then perhaps he needs to consider it's the artists' poor money management rather than the producers? If you spent a fortune on bling, flash cars clothes etc and spent the lot then that isn't the fault of the producers.
Maybe they should be given better guidance and help around those affairs if wealth is alien to them? Perhaps it's part of the 'image' and they feel they have to do it because no-one going to listen to a grime artist with an investment portfolio, ISA and country pad, driving a sensible, economic runabout dressed in M&S trousers cos they think they're comfortable?
But just because you've not ended up with a big house at the end of a lucrative deal is down to them and what they do with the money they're given.
With you on most of that, but artists ending up poor isn’t about bad money management. One I remember is the members of S Club got something ridiculous like less than £500k for the entire time despite being one of the biggest groups around for years.
The deals in music are shitty and exploitative.
That’s got fuck all to do with “da joos“ though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?