but surely the PL would not sanction the 'admin movements' & 'groundshare' without proof? Therefore, who is providing the owners with guarantees of funding. The owners could not just state the have the required funds without supporting evidence?
I just do not understand who would finance / part finance this Project as there cannot even be a tangible business case without even a confirmed location to build for starters. None of this stacks up.
I will tootle off under the assumption I am just plain old naive............
KLP
I will tootle off under the assumption I am just plain old naive............
KLP
what are the early stages , the blagging the fl bit.I suspect the owners of sisu are actually funding the project, in its early stages.
I suspect the owners of sisu are actually funding the project, in its early stages.
according to Fisher (fans forum 6/6/13), the monies for this project would be found by 'converting equity',
i,ve not looked at the Fisher dictionary, i can't find one,
& it doesn't appear in the Roger Mellie profanosaurus,
so presumably up to Mr F to explain,
pause.................. long pause.........................,
maybe another one of his ******** statements
Afternoon all- As like many I have become increasingly bemused by the recent events. However..........
I have one question that is still perplexing me. I will keep the narrative simple for my own benefit.
This is not an anti owner question. Just an open & honest one.
Assuming our owners have already lots many millions & DO plan the build a new home, who will / is funding this venture circa £40-50 in total?
I personally just cannot see how these vast sums can be raised through the 'hedge' method based on recent experiences.
Regards all, KLP
PUSB
I am guessing that the converting of equity will be Ryton. Would explain why they are looking at Brandon for training facilities.
As per a question to Fisher at his forums "who will actually own the new stadium"?
Who ever these investors might be they will want there money back and with interest.
Rent probably more than what it was at Ricoh
KLP,
I am sure Fisher said the money would be raised by equity and via loans, however would this be enough we shall have to wait and see, reading the article on the CT website today regarding the sites for CCFC, a spokesman from the CBRE said “Otium has invested significant financial resources in the project to date and continue to do so to ensure expedient completion of the stadium within the Coventry area."
So by the sounds of it to some extent it looks like to an extent that Otium are willing to pump it's own cash in to finance the resources and completion of this stadium itself.
well what ever that substantial amount may be it clearly isn't enough as it doesn't even seemed to have covered the cost of contacting ccc and all the other surrounding bourough councills to help locate a potential site, which apparently is the 1st step. 3-5years is ticking by, someone needs to pull their socks up and quick.
Who ever these investors might be they will want there money back and with interest.
Rent probably more than what it was at Ricoh
Being pedantic, that's not strictly true.
What the investors will want is to see their money working for them and yielding a return. They will obviously want to see that their money is safe, although even that is not an absolute per-requisite, depending on the risk strategy they have. For some, they are prepared to see short term losses against long term gain (and I talk of sustaining losses for years if there is a prospect of long term gains).
there's still some on here that believe it too, "in slimie Fisher we trust ".It's rubbish isn't it, the new stadium plan. Everyone except the FL know it's never going to happen - in fact I think that by now even the FL know it, but they've painted themselves into a corner.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?