Pompey's admin was totally deserved so I don't buy people saying that some how means the other clubs 'didn't deserve' to stay up through running themselves better. We threw away nearly 30 points from in front last season (in fact may have been more)-does a team totally out of its depth do that? If the team was that bad it'd be getting tonked every week regardless of the manager.
Wasn't you an AT defender until recently? I rest my case.
Hindsight is brilliant, I don't think many managers would've wanted to manage us last season, this yea we were more attractive to manage in a way A) great L1 squad B) great rep if you do well with CCFC this season (revival etc.)
I never said their admin was undeserved.
Donny didn't get tanked every game.
There were a lot of things AT did wrong, but, who's to say other managers wouldn't make similar mistakes? We dropped many points from winning positions, that was bad, a ridiculous amount in the last 15m, I blame the fitness on AT, I feel, he felt we didn't need fitness as we'd pass our way to victory. No point dwelling on last year, we're in L1 and IMO, relegation was a blessing in disguise, as we had t rebuild and get rid of 'deadwood' which we have (Clingan etc.) and we've brought in some good players, championship quality.
IMO, if we got promoted, I think a CB, LB, RM/LM and maybe a back up striker to do ok in the Championship*
To me, selling Juke killed any chance of survival.
*if we keep Bailey and McG. If we got promoted, I'd like to see Blair signed permanently, can't see him breaking into their 1st team.
I still feel AT should have been given a chance, i was making your point
Our major problem last year was our inability to score, we scored less than anyone else in the league and averaged less than a goal per game. Although we threw away a lot of leads a lot of that was down to our inability to score the crucial second goal to kill off a game. Overall defensively we weren't too bad, 6 teams conceded more than us.Pompey's admin was totally deserved so I don't buy people saying that some how means the other clubs 'didn't deserve' to stay up through running themselves better. We threw away nearly 30 points from in front last season (in fact may have been more)-does a team totally out of its depth do that? If the team was that bad it'd be getting tonked every week regardless of the manager.
Would we have surrendered 30 points under a manager who wasn't so darn clueless? Unlikely. Agree that the point is moot now but also fair to make-that muppet and the failure to dismiss him got us relegated and also has seriously dented our chances of getting back up.
Our major problem last year was our inability to score, we scored less than anyone else in the league and averaged less than a goal per game. Although we threw away a lot of leads a lot of that was down to our inability to score the crucial second goal to kill off a game. Overall defensively we weren't too bad, 6 teams conceded more than us.
I believe a proper manager would have improved us but I'm not convinced Robins would have kept us up, mainly due to the fact that I don't think Deleui would have backed him in the transfer market. We may have managed to survive until the final game of the season though rather than being relegated with a couple of games to go.
Our strikers apart from Juke were very poor - Eastwood and Platt are now plying their trade in League Two, Cody and ROD can't get n our side now we're in league one and Nimely is festering in Man City reserves.
I would label him a failure - for sure.
I feel Shaw made a massive dent in our hopes of promotion as the effects of that regime made it difficult for MR to start with, hence his post match comments v Carlisle. I feel the draws v Yeovil and Sheff U weren't too bad, Yeovil got off to a flyer, and Sheff U are favourites (I feel we're better than them tbh, they don't have a good enough striker) to win the league, however, Bury was embarrassing and I feel that, rightly was the straw that broke the canals back as that was 3 draws, from 3 winning positions!
No torch robins is a proven manager,thorn was a cheap option,it must of been great for sisu when clapping seals like you were comparing him to sillett so they could give him the job.
Good, disciplined teams can hold on to tight leads though Stu-but even then, they don't set up in damage limitation mode every week. Doing that coupled with a part-time fitness coach it is no wonder we folded so regularly late on. Agree that some of the players were especially poor and that backing was minimal-but I'd still argue that a better manager would've secured Champs status. Would they have kept it this season as well? Don't think so.
I know what your saying Brighton and this is no defense of Thorn, he should have gone at the end of last season but I don't think we had the players to play that disciplined way, not with such inexperienced players as Christie, Thomas, and bigi playing first team football for the first time, as well as hussey, gardner, nimely and Norwood.
Robins has done amazing with this squad compared to what it was, however as people keep pointing out this is one of the top 3 highest wage bills so should be playing at this level. Last season we had one of the lowest wages bills in the championship, it will be interesting to see how low it actually was when the next lot of accounts come out.
A lot of people made a lot out of those 3 games-a futile exercise really as teams are still getting into their swing at that point. Shaw I don't think should be judged too harshly-the man who brought him to the club was sacked within barely any time of him arriving and he was handed a caretaker role he wasn't suited for.
The fact remains, he lost 3 winnable games, 4th v Tranmere I wasn't surprised to lose. I thought his squad selection was a sick joke. Kilbane LM!? Brown on the pitch!? Elliott? Losing 4-1 to Shrewesbury... More out of his depth than Thorn, when he moved from the diamond to 4-4-2 was it for me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?