sorry italia but I posted this about 3 months ago as a possible site, next to Webster's Park but as I'm from Rugby didn't know what it was.Looks big enough to take an arena, looking at the size of the Ricoh scale but how contaminated is it? would the CCC allow it to be developed and there be two stadia close to each other, Sheffield's grounds are miles apart as are Nottinghams although in our case, each would be for different sports exclusively. is it a goer??
Yes I have to both, and looking I realise they are closer than I thought, but maybe being separated by the river has made them seem further apart.:facepalm:
This seems the likely explanation to me, as the FOI requests have been badly worded. There is no need to mention CCFC in the questions – just ask about discussions with ANY party regarding proposals for a stadium development.
Any land dealings could easily be in the name of separate entities in true SISU style – after all, even Coventry City Football Club Ltd. didn’t having anything to do with the football club did it? It was just a “non-trading property subsidiary”.
The owners could have cleared up the confusion at any time in the last year or so with a simple public statement, explaining why the FOI requests have drawn a blank. You’d think they’d want to defend their reputation, but no - they prefer to take the piss and keep people running round in circles. The same slimy attitude comes through in virtually everything they do, which is why I’m really struggling to retain my love for the club.
Yes I have to both, and looking I realise they are closer than I thought, but maybe being separated by the river has made them seem further apart.:facepalm:
They use the empty stadium for parking when the one side is at home.
Used the Notts County club when playing Nottingham Forest.
Place it in Rowley Green behind Leekes and do the same.
They use the empty stadium for parking when the one side is at home.
Used the Notts County club when playing Nottingham Forest.
Place it in Rowley Green behind Leekes and do the same.
Not too fussed about it being outside of Coventry if it is there then?
You know that famous Lucas quote "commercial confidentiality"? Well it applies to FOI requests so even CCC will say they nothing even if the planning application is inside boundary
No where, because their wont be a new stadium, seriously cannot believe people are still believing this bollocks like little rats following the pied piper. One day you will wake up and smell the coffee.
There is a huge assumption that SISU, or one of its many divisions or CCFC are trying to buy and or build a standrum on a piece of land.
My thinking is either (and this is my thinking on things from deepest darkest Essex)
1. A third party is buying the land for a major retailer, the stadium complex will be part of this land., therefore FOI requests will come up negative.
2 (AND THIS FITS SISU's business model) Brum CC need to raise funds and are trying to sell off the NEC and land around it, The Blue noses are also in financial trouble, due to owner, it would make sense (in SISU's eyes, but not to any football fan) to build a new stadium at NEC for both teams to share, SISU then get to sell off chunks of NEC and make some money back.
Note, not for 1 minute would I support option 1 or 2 , but it might answer some of the confusion, but I pray I'm wide of thihe mark
Only RFC believes it. There is nobody else that does.
The arguments are around which would be best if we had the options, the Ricoh or a new stadium.
I'm saying we need to get the best deal we can at the Ricoh s as it's the only option.
The longer Sisu play games the less chance we have of that happening.
Wayyyyyy off the mark, and can you imagine what WMP would say to that, I mean seriously, share with the blue noses .. stop taking those drugs pal.
How do you know? Do you have insider information?
No room that side
Between Leekes and M6 would be ideal.
I thought it had to be in Coventry?
You could be right – but that still means the club could clear up this up for the fans, if they cared two hoots about the negative effect of this FOI debate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?