Yea they are complete clowns.I'm confused about Eastwood, because CWR on Saturday had said he'd gone. Lo and behold there he is playing for the reserves today.
fair enough I thought released meant he would no longer be on the wage bill or with the club in any way.when a player is released like he was they stay at the club until a club comes in and say's we'll take him and bay his wages he's on free transfer like joey barton for newcastle
I'm confused about Eastwood, because CWR on Saturday had said he'd gone. Lo and behold there he is playing for the reserves today.
No, plonker Linnell erroneously said he's been "given a free transfer", only to back-track later on and say "we must stress, he is still at the club".
What it actually means in reality is that if a club wants to come in and take over his contract, we won't ask for a fee.
On Saturday, I agree with the OP about McPake but it depends how fit he is. The same could be said about most of our options. I hope Deegan is fit, but think Thomas deserves another chance. As I've said elsewhere, I thought his pressing and tackling first half was sublime, as reflected in the (non-partisan) Sunday Mercury match report. It was interesting to see something like that highlighted when not a soul on here deemed it fit to pass comment on. Is Thomas the ball-winner we have been lacking? I think he and Deegan (when fit) look like our best central-two in this formation as their games are the most multi-faceted.
I'd normally be desperate to see McSheffrey back as he's our only natural "hole" player, but he's been complete and utter pish this season (Reading game aside, when he was as good as he's been in ages). At least Bell tackles, keeps the ball, and doesn't fall over all the time like Sheff has this season.
He has been back in training for a couple of weeks now and has had a decent pre-season, I don't see why he wouldn't be fit enough to at least be considered.McPake is obviously not fully fit and thus shouldn't start. We know exacty how crap is when we play him less than 100%. A couple of friendliest isn't enough football when you've been out or as long as he has.
i disagree because if i remember correctly that against burnley it was partly his fault we let in one of the goals AT said and as for sheffs i would rather him in the hole and bell in central midfield! Due to the fact sheffs is faster and is more of a goal threat where as bell is a passer and crosser
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?